Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 1274 of 2017· [2023] KEELRC 868 (KLR)

Musembi v Kings Developers Ltd (Cause 1274 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 868 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
6 April 2023
2,560 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed an unfair termination claim because the worker's fixed-term contract had simply expired and he couldn't prove continued employment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, Benjamin Mulei Musembi, sued for unlawful and unfair termination and terminal dues of Ksh 315,993, alleging he was employed from June 14, 2015 as a casual/machine operator and dismissed in 2017 in retaliation for filing a personal injury suit against the respondent. The respondent denied any employment relationship beyond a fixed term contract and said the claim was directed at the wrong entity. The court framed four issues: whether the engagement ended on expiry of the contract; whether termination was unlawful; the claimant's basic salary; and entitlement to the prayers. On the evidence, the claimant admitted receiving a 10-month written contract dated March 1, 2016 ending December 31, 2016. The only proof of continued employment was a single unsigned payslip the respondent denied issuing, its witness testifying that its payslips are signed and stamped and that she had no records of leave, house allowance or pre-2016 employment. Applying the Court of Appeal decision in the Presbyterian Church of East Africa case and the Ronald Ongori Gwaro decision, the court held that fixed term contracts expire by effluxion of time and carry no expectations beyond expiry. The claimant produced no proof of work, salary, the alleged injury or the suit after expiry, only mere allegations. The court found no employment relationship beyond the 10 months, no unfair or wrongful termination, and dismissed the claim with each party bearing their own costs. Judgment was delivered virtually in Nairobi on April 6, 2023.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an employment relationship existed beyond the 10-month fixed term contract

Holding

The court found, on a balance of probability, that the claimant was never employed by the respondent beyond the 10 months stated in the contract dated March 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

Reasoning

The only evidence of continued employment was one unsigned payslip which the respondent denied issuing, noting its payslips are normally signed and stamped. The respondent's witness had no records of employment before 2016, of leave taken, or of house allowance. Given the unsigned document and the claimant's initial reluctance on how he was engaged, the court found no employment relationship beyond the fixed term.

p. 5
02

Whether the termination was unlawful

Holding

There was no termination at all; the employment relationship ended by effluxion of time on expiry of the fixed term contract

Reasoning

Following the Court of Appeal in the Presbyterian Church of East Africa case, fixed term contracts expire by effluxion of time and carry no expectations beyond expiry. The claimant produced no proof of work or payment after December 31, 2016, and no proof of the injury or the civil suit he said prompted the termination. His allegations were mere assertions without documentary or other evidence.

p. 5
03

Whether the claimant was entitled to the prayers sought

Holding

The claimant was not entitled to any of the claimed dues or remedies

Reasoning

Since the court found no unfair or wrongful termination, the remedies under the Employment Act, which are available only where termination is held unlawful or unfair, could not be awarded. Claims for notice pay, house allowance, leave, PAYE, NSSF, NHIF, service pay and 12 months' compensation all fell away with the dismissal of the claim.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Fixed term contracts expire by effluxion of time and carry no rights, obligations or expectations beyond the date of expiry; a claim of unfair termination cannot arise from a contract that has simply expired
  • An employee alleging employment beyond a fixed term must present some proof, such as payment of salaries, bank statements or other communication from the employer; the employee cannot come to court with nothing and expect the employer to provide his evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claimant's claim is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to pay their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Sections 41, 43, 45, 47(5), 74
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)Section 1B
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 159(2)(d) and 48

Cases cited (5)

  • Registered Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of East Africa and Another versus Ruth Gathoni Ngotho-Kariuki
    2017 eKLR
  • Sandra M Waswa vs Global Campaign for Free Expression
    2022 eKLR
  • Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union versus Keen Kleeners Limited
    Cause No 163 of 2013
  • Registered Trustees De La Salle Christian Brothers T/A St Mary's Boys' Secondary School vs DM Baini
    2017 eKLR
  • Ronald Ongori Gwaro vs M/S Sturoplast Ltd
    No 949 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and the Employment Act, 2007 (specific enabling provision not cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Musembi v Kings Developers Ltd (Cause 1274 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 868 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No 1274 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/868/eng@2023-04-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.