Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 387 of 2018· [2023] KEELRC 796 (KLR)

Kenya National Union of Nurses [KNUN] v National Industrial Bank (NIC) & 5 others (Cause 387 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 796 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 March 2023
2,802 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a trade union registered under the Labour Relations Act, 2007, sued the 1st respondent (a bank), the 2nd respondent (an office established under the LRA) and the 3rd to 6th respondents (nurses and a former official of Uasin Gishu Public Service Board) after discovering that union dues deducted from its members were being remitted into account No.xxx opened at the 1st respondent's Eldoret branch. The claimant sought freezing of the account, quashing of the account-opening instruments, declarations of illegality and fraud, criminal investigations, transfer of all monies to its gazetted accounts, and costs. Only the 1st respondent entered appearance, contending that it opened the joint account in March 2017 on the 3rd to 6th respondents' instructions for a PSV business, conducted due diligence, and acted in good faith with no fraud. The 2nd to 6th respondents, though served, did not attend. The court held that their non-attendance left the claimant's evidence unchallenged. Applying sections 48 and 50 of the LRA, the court found that remitting union dues into an unauthorised account, in collusion with the 3rd to 6th respondents, was a serious breach of the law. However, it noted that the employers who facilitated the remittances ought ideally to have been enjoined. Judgment was entered for the claimant: all monies in account No.xxx are to be remitted to the claimant's authorised Barclays Bank account; the 1st respondent is to furnish the account statements to enable the claimant identify employers and pursue recovery and investigations; the 1st respondent may thereafter maintain the account for the PSV business; costs against the 3rd to 6th respondents jointly and or individually, with the 1st respondent bearing its own costs. Delivered at Mombasa on 27 March 2023 by M. Mbarũ J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mandatory remittance of trade union dues to the Minister's designated account

Holding

Remittance of union dues into any account other than the Minister's designated account breaches sections 48 and 50 of the LRA, and the monies so held must be remitted to the claimant's authorised account

Reasoning

Section 48(2) directs that dues be paid into a specified account of the trade union; section 50(1) prohibits an employer from deducting money and not paying it into the designated account or paying into another account; section 50(9) and (10) criminalise requesting or using such deductions for other purposes. Given the claimant's recognition, diversion of dues into account No.xxx was a serious breach done in collusion with the 3rd to 6th respondents.

p. 5
02

Effect of non-attendance by the 2nd to 6th respondents

Holding

The 2nd to 6th respondents' non-attendance left the claimant's evidence unchallenged and it was accepted

Reasoning

The 3rd to 6th respondents had knowledge of the proceedings as the account holders; their failure to attend denied the court crucial material evidence and left the claims against them unchallenged, so the claimant's word was taken as correct against them.

p. 4
03

Liability of the 1st respondent (bank) and its obligation to render an account

Holding

The 1st respondent, though alleging due diligence, ought to have filed the account statements when called upon; it was ordered to produce them rather than bear liability outright

Reasoning

Even where a bank opens an account on customers' instructions, once served and called upon to account it should in good faith file the statement of the account. The court directed it to produce the statements to enable the claimant identify employers and pursue recovery and investigations under section 50(10).

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an employer has a Recognition Agreement with a trade union and the Minister has gazetted the authorised account, remitting union dues to any other account is a serious breach of sections 48 and 50 of the LRA
  • Where respondents served with proceedings do not attend or challenge the claim, the claimant's uncontroverted evidence stands

Court orders

#
  1. 1.All monies held in account No.xxx held by the 1st respondent from the date the account was opened to date shall be removed and remitted to the claimant through the Kenya National Union of Nurses Barclays Bank of Kenya Queensway Branch Nairobi account
  2. 2.The 1st respondent is directed to remit to the claimant bank statement(s) with regard to account No.xxx from the date the account was opened to date to allow the claimant address pursuant to section 50(10) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007
  3. 3.Based on the bank statements, the claimant shall be at liberty to pursue recovery of any monies remitted to account No.xxx and removed by the 3rd to 6th respondents relating to trade union dues
  4. 4.Costs of the proceedings for the claimant shall be met by the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th respondents jointly and or individually
  5. 5.The 1st respondent shall bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 39
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 47
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 48 (including 48(2))
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 50 (including 50(1), 50(8), 50(9), 50(10))
  • Employment Actsection 19(6)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010article 41
  • Banking Act

Cases cited (4)

  • Kenya National Union of Teachers v Eco Bank Kenya Limited & 8 others [2020] eKLR
    [2020] eKLR
  • Nelson Onyango Otho & 5 others v Rashid Jumaa Nyale & another [2014] eKLR
    [2014] eKLR
  • Peter Wafula Juma & 2 others v Republic [2014] eKLR
    [2014] eKLR
  • Central Bank Limited v Trust Bank Limited & 4 others [1996] eKLR
    [1996] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over trade union dues disputes under the Labour Relations Act, 2007 and Article 41 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya National Union of Nurses [KNUN] v National Industrial Bank (NIC) & 5 others (Cause 387 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 796 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No 387 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/796/eng@2023-03-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.