Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 150 of 2019· [2023] KEELRC 759 (KLR)

Gichura v Armchair Insurance Brokers Ltd (Cause 150 of 2019) [2023] KEELRC 759 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 March 2023
2,717 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court refused to force an employer to hand over confidential financial statements to a former employee who had no contractual right to a share of profits.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, formerly an underwriting officer with the respondent's sister company and later a principal officer of the respondent, applied by notice of motion dated July 15, 2022 seeking an order compelling the respondent to produce its brokers and MIPS annual returns, financial statements and audited annual accounts for the period July 2015 to November 2018. She sued for compensation for the unauthorised use of her testimonials, quantified as a percentage of the respondent's net profits for that period. The respondent opposed the application, arguing the claim was commercial and outside the ELRC's jurisdiction, that a discharge voucher signed on November 6, 2018 absolved it of further claims, and that the documents sought were confidential. The court framed two issues: jurisdiction and whether production should be ordered. It held the dispute arose from an employment relationship, both parties having acknowledged a contract of employment, so the ELRC had jurisdiction under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 12 of the ELRC Act. The discharge voucher argument failed because the parties subsequently executed a partial mediation agreement reserving severance pay, compensation for use of testimonials and notice pay for determination; that agreement was not a consent and was not conclusive of the suit. However, finding no contractual provision for a 10% commission, and that the financial documents were confidential and it would be unfair to release them to a former employee, the court dismissed the application with costs in the cause, allowing the claimant to proceed with the unresolved issues under the partial mediation agreement.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction over the claim for compensation for unauthorised use of the claimant's testimonials

Holding

The court has jurisdiction because the dispute arises from an acknowledged employment relationship between the claimant and the respondent.

Reasoning

The respondent argued the claim was commercial and outside section 12 of the ELRC Act. The court noted there was a contract of employment and both parties accepted an employment relationship existed; the claimant was terminated from employment as well as removed as director and principal officer. The dispute therefore arose from employment, conferring jurisdiction under Article 162(2) and section 12 of the ELRC Act.

p. 5
02

Whether signing a discharge voucher and a partial mediation agreement divested the court of jurisdiction

Holding

No; the discharge voucher argument fails because the parties later entered a partial mediation agreement leaving outstanding issues for court determination.

Reasoning

The respondent contended the discharge voucher of November 6, 2018 absolved it of further claims. The court held that the subsequent partial mediation agreement, which expressly reserved severance pay, compensation for use of testimonials and notice pay for determination, contradicted the contention that all claims were settled; the mediation agreement is not a consent and is not conclusive of the suit.

p. 5
03

Whether the respondent should be compelled to produce financial documents for the claim of 10% of net profits

Holding

The application was dismissed because there was no contractual entitlement to a 10% commission and the documents sought were confidential.

Reasoning

The court found no provision in the contract of employment for payment of a 10% commission on the respondent's profits, and stated courts cannot rewrite contracts. Relying on Lelan I Salano v Intercontinental Hotel, it held the financial statements are confidential documents and it would be unfair to avail them to a former employee whose employment ended on November 6, 2018.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A dispute arising out of an employment relationship falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the ELRC under Article 162(2) and section 12 of the ELRC Act.
  • A discharge voucher does not divest the court of jurisdiction where the parties subsequently executed a partial mediation agreement leaving issues for determination.
  • Parties in an employment relationship are bound by their contract of employment, and courts cannot rewrite contracts.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated July 15, 2022 is dismissed.
  2. 2.Costs are in the cause.
  3. 3.The claimant may proceed with the other unresolved issues as per the partial mediation agreement.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 35(1)(b)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 22
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11 rule 3 (as cited 'order ii rule 3'); Order 21 Rule 1
  • Employment ActSection 49
  • Companies ActForm 2015 (as referenced)
  • Insurance ActReferred to generally

Cases cited (5)

  • Lustman & Company 1990 Ltd vs Corporate Business Centre Ltd & 4 Others
    KEHC 42
  • ABN AMRO Bank NV vs Kenya Pipeline Company Ltd
    [2014] eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another vs Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Coastal Bottlers Limited vs Kimathi Mithika
    [2018] eKLR
  • Lelan 1 Salano vs Intercontinental Hotel
    [2013] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gichura v Armchair Insurance Brokers Ltd (Cause 150 of 2019) [2023] KEELRC 759 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No 150 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/759/eng@2023-03-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.