Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedClaim dated October 19, 2021 (Kisumu Employment and Labour Relations Court)· [2023] KEELRC 744 (KLR)

Omutsani v Great Lakes University of Kisumu (Cause E071 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 744 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
28 March 2023
1,866 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that a job appointment issued by someone without hiring authority creates no valid employment relationship, so the dismissed manager got nothing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed as Manager of the respondent university's Enterprise Service Unit by letter dated March 12, 2018, alleged his employment was for two years and was unfairly and unlawfully terminated in June 2018 without a disciplinary hearing, about two months into service. He sought a declaration of unfair termination, salary arrears, compensation and specific performance of the contract. The respondent denied that a valid employment relationship existed, contending that the appointment was made by Prof. Atieno Ndede-Amadi, a Vice-Chancellor under suspension and subsequently dismissed, who lacked authority to recruit; it asserted the claimant voluntarily stopped reporting to work and left with other staff aligned to the former Vice-Chancellor during management wrangles. The claimant admitted in evidence that there was no vacancy, that he knew of the management wrangles, and that the person who hired him had no authority. Relying on Isuzu East Africa Ltd v Nyangweso and Monica Kanini Mutua v Al-Arafat Shopping Centre, the court held that the claimant bore the burden of proving both the employment relationship and the termination, neither of which he discharged. The court found that an appointment issued unprocedurally by a dismissed Vice-Chancellor created no employment relationship and that the law does not aid a volunteer who knowingly accepts an irregular appointment. The Memorandum of Claim dated October 19, 2021 was dismissed in its entirety with no order on costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an employment relationship existed between the claimant and the respondent

Holding

No employment relationship was established; the appointment was made by a dismissed Vice-Chancellor without authority, and the claimant knew this.

Reasoning

The claimant produced an appointment letter but admitted knowing there was no vacancy, that management wrangles existed, and that the person who hired him had no authority. The court held an unprocedural appointment is invalid and that the law does not aid a volunteer. The claimant also failed to prove termination, not producing any termination letter.

p. 4
02

Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated and entitled to reliefs

Holding

The claim of unfair termination failed and all reliefs were refused as moot.

Reasoning

Since no valid employment relationship was found, there could be no unfair termination. The claims for unpaid salaries and compensation were rendered moot, and the Memorandum of Claim was dismissed in its entirety.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • An appointment issued unprocedurally by a person without authority does not create a valid employment relationship.
  • A claimant must first establish the existence of an employment relationship before claiming unfair termination.
  • The burden lies on the party alleging employment to prove it on a balance of probability.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's Memorandum of Claim dated October 19, 2021 is dismissed.
  2. 2.The claimant's claim is dismissed in its entirety with no order on costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya2010 (fair labour practices)
  • Employment Act2007

Cases cited (3)

  • Jackson Cheruiyot Rono v. County Secretary Bomet & another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Isuzu East Africa Limited (Formerly General Motors East Africa Limited) v Joseph Likoe Nyangweso
    [2020] eKLR
  • Monica Kanini Mutua v Al-Arafat Shopping Centre & another
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act 2007 and the Constitution of Kenya 2010 (fair labour practices)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Omutsani v Great Lakes University of Kisumu (Cause E071 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 744 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Claim dated October 19, 2021 (Kisumu Employment and Labour Relations Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/744/eng@2023-03-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.