Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNairobi/Milimani Commercial Courts Civil Suit No 3011 of 2008 (transferred via ELRC Miscellaneous Application No 81 of 2017)· [2023] KEELRC 673 (KLR)

Osiemo v Radar Limited (Cause 196 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 673 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
16 March 2023
847 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court dismissed a claim filed over four years late because employment claims must be filed within three years.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This claim began as Nairobi/Milimani Commercial Courts Civil Suit No 3011 of 2008 and was transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court by order of November 8, 2017 in ELRC Miscellaneous Application No 81 of 2017. The Claimant, employed as a driver, sought severance pay of Kshs 5,993.00, untaken leave for two years valued at Kshs 11,986.00, and Kshs 72,384.00 for public holidays and Sundays worked, alleging malicious termination through a stage-managed resignation procured by duress and undue influence on or about November 11, 2003. The Respondent filed a defence but did not attend the hearing on September 29, 2022 despite being served, and the matter proceeded ex parte. When preparing judgment, the court noted sua sponte that the suit had been filed about four and a half years after the cause of action arose. Relying on section 90 of the Employment Act, which requires employment claims to be instituted within three years, and applying its earlier decision in Lawrence Gachau Kihu v County Government of Nairobi, the court held the claim time-barred, dismissed it, and ordered each party to bear its own costs. Judgment was delivered virtually on March 16, 2023 pursuant to COVID-19 directions issued by the Chief Justice.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claim is barred by limitation under section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

Yes. The cause of action arose on or about November 11, 2003 when the Claimant's employment was terminated, and the suit was filed about 4½ years later, well beyond the three-year limitation period

Reasoning

Paragraph 4 of the plaint disclosed the cause of action and its date. The court invoked section 90 of the Employment Act, which requires employment-based claims to be filed within three years of the act, neglect or default complained of. Applying its earlier reasoning in Lawrence Gachau Kihu v County Government of Nairobi, the court held the three-year period under section 90 displaced the six-year period under section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act. The parties did not raise the point, but jurisdiction being fundamental, the court addressed it on its own motion.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 90 of the Employment Act ousts section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act and reduces the limitation period for employment claims from six to three years
  • A court may raise and determine a jurisdictional limitation issue sua sponte even where parties did not plead or canvass it

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit is dismissed as time-barred
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 90
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 4(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21)Section 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48

Cases cited (1)

  • Lawrence Gachau Kihu v County Government of Nairobi
    NBI ELRC No 1456 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 (limitation of employment claims), the matter having been transferred from the Chief Magistrate's Court to the ELRC

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Osiemo v Radar Limited (Cause 196 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 673 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Nairobi/Milimani Commercial Courts Civil Suit No 3011 of 2008 (transferred via ELRC Miscellaneous Application No 81 of 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/673/eng@2023-03-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.