Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutCause No E032 of 2022· [2023] KEELRC 618 (KLR)

Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union v Ikonia Resort & Hotels Limited & another (Cause E032 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 618 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
16 March 2023
918 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a trade union cannot sue for a worker unless it has a signed recognition agreement with the employer.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This first-instance ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu determined a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 13th March 2022 by the Respondents, seeking to strike out the Claimant union's Memorandum of Claim on two grounds: that the Claimant had no locus standi to represent the grievant for want of a recognition agreement with the 1st Respondent, and that it lacked privity of contract with the 2nd Respondent for want of an employer-employee relationship. The Claimant opposed the objection through a replying affidavit, arguing that recognition under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act exists only to pave the way for collective bargaining and that articles 3, 22 and 258 of the Constitution empowered it to sue on behalf of a member. Justice Christine N. Baari applied the Mukisa Biscuit test, found the objection to be a pure point of law since lack of a recognition agreement was undisputed, and held that under sections 54(1) and 54(3) of the Labour Relations Act an employer cannot recognise a union absent a written recognition agreement; without recognition the union has no interest to protect and no locus standi to file a trade dispute or represent a grievant, following Communication Workers Union v Safaricom Limited. The court further held that without a recognition agreement the Claimant had no employer-employee relationship with the Respondents. The preliminary objection was upheld, the Memorandum of Claim dated 15th July 2022 was struck out with costs to the Respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a trade union without a recognition agreement has locus standi to sue on behalf of a member

Holding

It does not; a union must first have a recognition agreement with the employer to represent a grievant

Reasoning

The court relied on section 54(1) and (3) of the Labour Relations Act, which oblige an employer to recognise a union representing a simple majority of unionisable employees and require a written recognition agreement. Absent such agreement, the employer cannot recognise the union as representative of the employees, the union has no interest to protect, and it lacks locus standi, following Communication Workers Union v Safaricom and Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organizations.

p. 3
02

Whether the objection qualified as a proper preliminary objection

Holding

Yes; it was treated as a pure point of law on the pleadings under the Mukisa Biscuit test

Reasoning

The court adopted the classic Mukisa Biscuit formulation that a preliminary objection is a point of law, pleaded or arising by clear implication from the pleadings, capable of disposing of the suit, and cannot be raised where facts must be ascertained or discretion exercised. The lack of a recognition agreement was undisputed, making it a point of law.

p. 2
03

Whether the Claimant had an employer-employee relationship with the 2nd Respondent

Holding

Without a recognition agreement the Claimant union has no employer-employee relationship with the Respondents

Reasoning

The court held that privity and the employer-employee relationship could not attach to the union absent recognition, so the suit against the 2nd Respondent could not stand. The Respondent's reliance on Stephen Onyango Otieno v Fiibarako Transporters on the futility of proceeding without an employment relationship was accepted.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Without a recognition agreement with the employer, a trade union has no locus standi to represent workers or file a trade dispute in court
  • A preliminary objection must be a pure point of law argued on the assumption that the facts pleaded are correct

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's Notice of Preliminary Objection is upheld
  2. 2.The Claimant's Memorandum of Claim dated 15th July, 2022 is struck out with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSection 54(1)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 54(3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 3, 22 and 258

Cases cited (4)

  • Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organizations v Board of Governors & Maina Wanjigi Secondary School
    (2015) eKLR
  • Stephen Onyango Otieno v Fiibarako Transporters Company Limited
    (2018) eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696
  • Communication Workers Union v Safaricom Limited
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (articles 3, 22, 258 of the Constitution invoked by the Claimant); Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union v Ikonia Resort & Hotels Limited & another (Cause E032 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 618 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Cause No E032 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/618/eng@2023-03-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.