Muthiani v Kuber Agencies Limited (Cause 1131 of 2015) [2023] KEELRC 336 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court ruled an employer cannot fire a driver for desertion without first proving it tried to reach him, awarding him compensation.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the claimant's employment was unlawfully terminated
The respondent failed to establish desertion and the demotion lacked a disciplinary process; termination was unlawful
The respondent asserted the claimant deserted duty, but desertion must be proved and the employer must show efforts to reach the employee. No such efforts were demonstrated. Further, the demotion from driver to turn boy was itself a disciplinary action not preceded by any section 41 disciplinary process, and incompetence should first have been addressed by pointing out shortcomings and allowing reasonable time to improve.
Remedies for the unlawful termination
Four months' salary in compensation, one month's notice pay, 12 days' salary for April 2015, certificate of service and costs
In assessing compensation the court considered the claimant's length of service and the respondent's unlawful conduct in the termination. Notice pay was awarded, and the claim for 12 days worked in April 2015 was admitted and payable. A certificate of service and costs followed as entitlements.
Legal principles established
#- An employer alleging desertion must prove it and show efforts made to reach the employee before termination
- Demotion is a disciplinary action that must be preceded by a disciplinary process under section 41
- Incompetence must first be pointed out and the employee given reasonable time to improve before demotion or termination
Court orders
#- 1.Judgment for the Claimant: 4 months' salary in compensation (Kshs. 71,800)
- 2.1 month's salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 17,950)
- 3.Salary for 12 days worked in April 2015 (Kshs. 7,180)
- 4.Total award of Kshs. 96,930 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full
- 5.Claimant entitled to a certificate of service
- 6.Costs of the case to the Claimant
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (claim for unlawful termination of employment)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Norah Kerubo Tagiri v Kenyenya FCS Limited[2026] KEELRC 2632 (KLR)29 Sept 2026
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Muthiani v Kuber Agencies Limited (Cause 1131 of 2015) [2023] KEELRC 336 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Memorandum of Claim dated June 9, 2015 (Cause). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/336/eng@2023-02-09
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.