Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutClaim dated March 21, 2017 (filed March 30, 2017)· [2023] KEELRC 104 (KLR)

Njau & 44 others v University of Nairobi & another (Cause 616 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 104 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 January 2023
2,141 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Employment Court struck out a Kshs 8.6 million claim against the University of Nairobi because it was filed about six years after the three-year legal deadline.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimants, employees of the University of Nairobi in the Department of Biochemistry, sued the University and its commercial arm, UNES, seeking Kshs 8,632,115.63 being unpaid balances for services rendered as direct service providers under the Module II (parallel degree) programme between 2004 and 2008. They contended the respondents paid only for the period from July 2008 to April 2011 and refused the earlier balance despite repeated demands. The respondents denied liability, asserting payments were governed by the council-approved policy on Module II fees distribution (Kibera IV), that payments made were motivational rather than contractual, and that the claim was statute barred. After full trial, Justice Stella Rutto framed two issues: limitation and entitlement to payment. Applying section 90 of the Employment Act, she held the cause of action accrued on July 1, 2011, when the claimants were informed by letter that the Vice Chancellor had not approved the payment, which they acknowledged on July 20, 2011. The suit, filed on March 30, 2017, was nearly six years late and time barred; the alleged continuing injury did not save it. Relying on Thuranira Karauri v Agnes Ncheche, the court held that limitation goes to jurisdiction and therefore the substantive entitlement could not be determined. The claim was struck out, with each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claim is statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

Yes - the cause of action arose on July 1, 2011 when the claimants were informed payment was not approved; suit filed March 30, 2017 was about six years later and time barred

Reasoning

The court held the cause of action accrued when the respondents made a definite decision not to pay and communicated it. The letter of July 1, 2011 from the Managing Director of UNES informed the claimants the Vice Chancellor had not approved payment. The claimants' own reply of July 20, 2011 acknowledged this. The suit filed on March 30, 2017 exceeded the three-year limit; the claimed continuing injury did not extend time.

p. 4
02

Whether the court could proceed to the substantive claim

Holding

No - limitation goes to jurisdiction, so the second issue could not be determined

Reasoning

Relying on Thuranira Karauri v Agnes Ncheche, the court held that once a claim is time barred, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it, and therefore the question of entitlement to the Kshs 8,632,115.60 could not be reached. The claim was accordingly struck out rather than dismissed on the merits.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Employment claims must be instituted within three years of the act, neglect or default complained of, and continuing injuries within twelve months of cessation (section 90, Employment Act)
  • A cause of action arises when the claimant knows of the definite decision refusing payment; limitation goes to jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claim dated March 21, 2017 and filed on March 30, 2017 is struck out for being time barred
  2. 2.Each party shall bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 90
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22)section 4(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21)section 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d); Article 48

Cases cited (6)

  • James Mugeria Igati v Public Service Commission
    (2014) eKLR
  • G4S Security Services (K) Limited v Joseph Kamau & 468 others
    (2018) eKLR
  • Martin Wanderi & 19 others v Engineers Registration Board of Kenya & 4 others
    (2020) eKLR
  • Attorney General & another v Andrew Maina Githinji & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Letang v Cooper
    [1964] 2 All ER 929 at 934
  • Thuranira Karauri v Agnes Ncheche
    [1997] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, section 90 (Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22) referenced therein)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njau & 44 others v University of Nairobi & another (Cause 616 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 104 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Claim dated March 21, 2017 (filed March 30, 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2023/104/eng@2023-01-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.