Munderu & 6 others v Panyako, the General Secretary, Kenya National Union of Nurses & 2 others (Cause E681 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court blocked the registration of union constitution changes that made it harder and costlier for ordinary nurses to contest leadership positions.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the suit is sub judice given Eldoret ELRC Petition No. 6 of 2020 and ELRC 633 of 2019
The suit is not sub judice because the subject matter and parties differ; the respondents failed to produce the pleadings in the Eldoret petition and neither the ruling nor the Registrar's report addressed registration of the 23rd October 2020 amendments
The court applied the Supreme Court's statement of the sub-judice rule requiring the same parties and same subject matter. The respondents did not produce the pleadings in Eldoret Petition No. 6 of 2020 to allow comparison of causes of action. The ruling relied on did not mention registration of constitutional changes, and the Registrar's report did not address the lawfulness of the October 2020 amendments, so the requirements of the doctrine were not established.
Whether the amended claim is in breach of Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act
Section 30 is inapplicable because the Registrar's letter of 5th July 2018 concerned the 2016 amendments, not the 23rd October 2020 amendments challenged in this suit, and the Registrar made no determination on the issue before the court
Section 30 requires an appeal against a decision of the Registrar within 30 days. The letter relied on by the respondents dealt with amendments ratified at the Special National Governing Council of 9th to 12th November 2016, whereas the suit concerns amendments made on 23rd October 2020. Since the Registrar made no determination on the challenged amendments, no appeal lay under Section 30.
Whether the union complied with the procedure for amendment of its constitution
The procedure was not complied with; the First Schedule to the Labour Relations Act requires decisions on constitutional amendment to be made by secret ballot, but the 14th July 2021 approval was virtual, a mode not provided for in the union constitution
Chapter XXII of the union constitution required a national referendum and ratification at a National or Special Governing Council meeting, and the First Schedule to the Act mandates secret ballot for constitutional amendments. Approval by a virtual National Governing Council meeting on 14th July 2021, and the absence of any evidence of a referendum question shared with all 47 counties, breached both the union constitution and the Act.
Whether the requirements of a degree for the Secretary General, exorbitant aspirant fees and five years' membership are unlawful/unconstitutional
They violate the Constitution and the Labour Relations Act: the degree requirement discriminates against the majority of members, fees imposed by delegates without member vote are unconstitutional, and the five-year requirement contradicts Sections 31 and 33 of the Act
Section 34(2)(a) forbids provisions discriminating unfairly between incumbents and other candidates; Section 31 requires only engagement in the sector and Section 33 eligibility to vote. Section 31 of the Act permits only a literacy requirement, not a degree. Article 41 guarantees every member the right to participate in union activities, so exclusions based on qualifications outside the law are unconstitutional and entrench incumbents.
Legal principles established
#- A union constitution cannot make provisions contrary to the Labour Relations Act; amendments affecting members must be decided by secret ballot of all members, not delegates
- Excluding members from vying for elective positions on the basis of a university degree is discriminatory since the Act requires only literacy in English and Kiswahili
- Raising aspirant fees by delegates without members voting by secret ballot at branch level is unconstitutional
- Any member whose subscriptions are not in arrears is eligible to vote and to vie for elective position in the union
Court orders
#- 1.A mandatory injunction issued directed at the 3rd Respondent restraining her from adopting and/or registering and/or approving the changes made to the 2nd Respondent's constitution at the Special National Governing Council held at Daiichi Hotel in Isiolo on 23rd October 2020
- 2.The 2nd Respondent shall pay the Claimants' costs of the suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act; Article 162(2) of the Constitution (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Munderu & 6 others v Panyako, the General Secretary, Kenya National Union of Nurses & 2 others (Cause E681 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Cause No E681 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1417/eng@2022-05-13
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.