Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No E681 of 2020· [2022] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)

Munderu & 6 others v Panyako, the General Secretary, Kenya National Union of Nurses & 2 others (Cause E681 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 May 2022
5,586 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~22 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court blocked the registration of union constitution changes that made it harder and costlier for ordinary nurses to contest leadership positions.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Claimants, members of the Kenya National Union of Nurses (KNUN), challenged the registration of amendments to the union constitution adopted at a Special National Governing Council meeting held at Daichi Hotel, Isiolo on 23rd October 2020. They sought a stay of the election notice issued by the General Secretary and a mandatory injunction restraining the Registrar of Trade Unions from adopting, registering or approving the amendments. They objected to three amendments: a degree requirement for the General Secretary, exorbitant non-refundable aspirant fees (Kshs.300,000 for General Secretary, Kshs.1 million for non-members, Kshs.50,000 at branch level), and a five-year membership requirement before vying for elective positions. The 1st and 2nd Respondents argued the suit was sub judice given Eldoret ELRC Petition No. 6 of 2020, that it breached Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act, that the amendment procedure was duly followed, and that the claim was overtaken by events. The court held the suit was not sub judice since the subject matter and parties differed from the Eldoret petition; Section 30 was inapplicable because the Registrar's 2018 letter concerned 2016 amendments; the amendment procedure breached Chapter XXII of the union constitution and the First Schedule to the Labour Relations Act requiring secret ballot; and the impugned qualifications, fees and service requirement violated the Constitution and the Act. The court issued a mandatory injunction restraining the Registrar from registering the 23rd October 2020 amendments and ordered the 2nd Respondent to pay the Claimants' costs. The claim succeeded on the registration issue but no stay of the election notice was granted, elections having been overtaken by events.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is sub judice given Eldoret ELRC Petition No. 6 of 2020 and ELRC 633 of 2019

Holding

The suit is not sub judice because the subject matter and parties differ; the respondents failed to produce the pleadings in the Eldoret petition and neither the ruling nor the Registrar's report addressed registration of the 23rd October 2020 amendments

Reasoning

The court applied the Supreme Court's statement of the sub-judice rule requiring the same parties and same subject matter. The respondents did not produce the pleadings in Eldoret Petition No. 6 of 2020 to allow comparison of causes of action. The ruling relied on did not mention registration of constitutional changes, and the Registrar's report did not address the lawfulness of the October 2020 amendments, so the requirements of the doctrine were not established.

p. 5
02

Whether the amended claim is in breach of Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

Section 30 is inapplicable because the Registrar's letter of 5th July 2018 concerned the 2016 amendments, not the 23rd October 2020 amendments challenged in this suit, and the Registrar made no determination on the issue before the court

Reasoning

Section 30 requires an appeal against a decision of the Registrar within 30 days. The letter relied on by the respondents dealt with amendments ratified at the Special National Governing Council of 9th to 12th November 2016, whereas the suit concerns amendments made on 23rd October 2020. Since the Registrar made no determination on the challenged amendments, no appeal lay under Section 30.

p. 6
03

Whether the union complied with the procedure for amendment of its constitution

Holding

The procedure was not complied with; the First Schedule to the Labour Relations Act requires decisions on constitutional amendment to be made by secret ballot, but the 14th July 2021 approval was virtual, a mode not provided for in the union constitution

Reasoning

Chapter XXII of the union constitution required a national referendum and ratification at a National or Special Governing Council meeting, and the First Schedule to the Act mandates secret ballot for constitutional amendments. Approval by a virtual National Governing Council meeting on 14th July 2021, and the absence of any evidence of a referendum question shared with all 47 counties, breached both the union constitution and the Act.

p. 9
04

Whether the requirements of a degree for the Secretary General, exorbitant aspirant fees and five years' membership are unlawful/unconstitutional

Holding

They violate the Constitution and the Labour Relations Act: the degree requirement discriminates against the majority of members, fees imposed by delegates without member vote are unconstitutional, and the five-year requirement contradicts Sections 31 and 33 of the Act

Reasoning

Section 34(2)(a) forbids provisions discriminating unfairly between incumbents and other candidates; Section 31 requires only engagement in the sector and Section 33 eligibility to vote. Section 31 of the Act permits only a literacy requirement, not a degree. Article 41 guarantees every member the right to participate in union activities, so exclusions based on qualifications outside the law are unconstitutional and entrench incumbents.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • A union constitution cannot make provisions contrary to the Labour Relations Act; amendments affecting members must be decided by secret ballot of all members, not delegates
  • Excluding members from vying for elective positions on the basis of a university degree is discriminatory since the Act requires only literacy in English and Kiswahili
  • Raising aspirant fees by delegates without members voting by secret ballot at branch level is unconstitutional
  • Any member whose subscriptions are not in arrears is eligible to vote and to vie for elective position in the union

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A mandatory injunction issued directed at the 3rd Respondent restraining her from adopting and/or registering and/or approving the changes made to the 2nd Respondent's constitution at the Special National Governing Council held at Daiichi Hotel in Isiolo on 23rd October 2020
  2. 2.The 2nd Respondent shall pay the Claimants' costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSections 4(2)(b),(c),(d), 30, 31, 33, 34(2)(a); First Schedule paragraphs 3, 8, 9, 10, 12
  • Labour Institutions ActSection 31(1)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 24(1), 27(2) & (3), 41(1), 41(2)(c), 41(4)(a), 159(2)(d), 48
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • Kenya National Union of Nurses ConstitutionChapter XXII (1) and (2); Article XXIII

Cases cited (7)

  • Safepark Limited v Henry Wambega & 11 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Kenya National Commission on Human Rights v Attorney General; Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 16 others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
  • Johnson Muthama v Minister for Justice & Constitutional Affairs & another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v The Republic No. 1 of 1978
  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance and 5 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Greys Jepkemoi Kiplagat v Zakayo Chepkonga Cheruiyot
    [2021] eKLR
  • Julia Mwenje Nyinkuri v Kenya County Government Workers Union
    [2021] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 30 of the Labour Relations Act; Article 162(2) of the Constitution (Employment and Labour Relations Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Munderu & 6 others v Panyako, the General Secretary, Kenya National Union of Nurses & 2 others (Cause E681 of 2020) [2022] KEELRC 1417 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Cause No E681 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1417/eng@2022-05-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.