Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the judgment as provided· [2022] KEELRC 1382 (KLR)

Nubian Rights Forum v National Hospital Insurance Fund & another (Petition E024 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 1382 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 June 2022
1,572 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that human rights organizations can sue to protect workers' rights, even when they are not employees themselves.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi, delivered by Nzioki Wa Makau, J on 29 June 2022, on a notice of preliminary objection dated 21 February 2022 filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents. The respondents sought dismissal of the petitioner's petition dated 8 February 2022 and the entire proceedings on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction under section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011 because the petitioner, a human rights organization, is neither an employee, employer, trade union, employer's organization, federation, Registrar of Trade Unions nor the Cabinet Secretary. They further contended the petition was amorphous and disclosed no cause of action, relying on Mukisa Biscuits and authorities holding that a suit filed without jurisdiction is dead on arrival and cannot be transferred. The petitioner countered that the court's jurisdiction flows from article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution, that the petition concerns recruitment and employment of public servants, and that articles 22, 41, 47 and 158 give it standing as a public interest litigant, citing Omtatah v Waiguru and Priscilla Nyokabi Kanyua. The court held that the substratum of the petition - alleged violation of rights of the 1st respondent's employees - falls within the core mandate of the ELRC, and that section 12 cannot be read to fetter constitutional rights. The petitioner was found to have the requisite locus standi. The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the petitioner. The judgment does not disclose the parties' names, case number or neutral citation.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the petitioner, a human rights organization, has locus standi to bring the petition before the ELRC

Holding

The petitioner has the requisite locus standi; its petition is anchored in articles 22 and 41 and 47 of the Constitution and constitutes public interest litigation

Reasoning

The court reasoned that articles 41 and 47 of the Constitution give anchor to parties such as the petitioner to raise constitutional issues relating to employment matters before the ELRC. The substratum of the petition concerns alleged violations of employees' rights of the 1st respondent, which falls within the core mandate of the court. A restrictive reading of section 12 of the ELRC Act confining suits to employers, employees and trade unions would fetter constitutional rights and is a misstep.

p. 3
02

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction to entertain the petition

Holding

The court has jurisdiction because the substratum of the petition relates to alleged violation of rights of employees of the 1st respondent, which is within the core mandate of the ELRC under article 162(2)(a)

Reasoning

The respondents argued the court lacked jurisdiction under section 12 of the ELRC Act because the petitioner is not an employee, trade union, employer's organization, federation, Registrar or Cabinet Secretary. The court held the jurisdictional argument flies in the face of articles 41 and 47 of the Constitution, and that disputes over recruitment and employment of public servants and related constitutional violations fall within the court's mandate.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A public interest litigant, including a human rights organization, has locus standi to institute a petition before the ELRC raising employment and labour relations constitutional issues, even where it is not itself an employee, employer or trade union
  • Section 12 of the ELRC Act cannot be interpreted so as to fetter constitutional rights in a public interest case before the court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st and 2nd respondents' preliminary objection dated February 21, 2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the preliminary objection awarded to the petitioner

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Actsection 12
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 162(2)(a)
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 41
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticle 47
  • Constitution of Kenyaarticles 22 and 158
  • Employment and Labour Relations Actnot specified

Cases cited (14)

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 696
  • Avtar Singh Bhamra & another v Oriental Commercial Bank, Kisumu
    HCCC No. 53 of 2004 (unreported)
  • John Njuguna Kimunya v Teresiah Wachuka Kimunya & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia v Kenya Commercial Bank & 2 others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Public Service Commission & 4 others v Cheruiyot & 32 others
    [2022] eKLR
  • Humphrey Makokha Nyongesa & Another v Communications Authority of Kenya & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Joseph Muthee Kamau & another v David Mwangi Gichure & another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Albert Chaurembo Mumba & 7 others v Maurice Munyao & 148 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Phoenix of East Africa Assurance Company Limited v M. Thiga t/a Newspaper Service
    [2019] eKLR
  • Daniel N Mugendi v Kenyatta University & 3 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • USIU v Attorney General
    [2012] eKLR
  • Ali Jarso Wako & another v Ministry of Interior & Coordination of National Government & 5 others; Public Service Commission & 5 Others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
  • Priscilla Nyokabi Kanyua v Attorney General & Interim Independent Electoral Commission
    [2010] eKLR
  • Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & Another v Anne Waiguru, Cabinet Secretary, Devolution and Planning & others
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(a) of the Constitution of Kenya; section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nubian Rights Forum v National Hospital Insurance Fund & another (Petition E024 of 2022) [2022] KEELRC 1382 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1382/eng@2022-06-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.