Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedJudicial Review Miscellaneous Application (ELRC, Nakuru), Notice of Motion dated December 1, 2021· [2022] KEELRC 1370 (KLR)

Republic v County Government of Kericho & another; Oduori & another (Exparte) (Judicial Review E002 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1370 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 July 2022
3,050 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court quashed Kericho County's eviction of hospital staff from quarters, ruling employers must give valid reasons, fair notice, and housing allowance.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex parte applicants, health records information officers employed by Kericho County Government and deployed to Londiani Sub-County Hospital, occupied staff houses by virtue of their employment. On October 18, 2021, following a notice dated October 14, 2021, they were directed to vacate the staff houses by midnight of October 31, 2021 to make room for renovation and use as call rooms for theatre nurses, without being heard, offered alternative housing, or paid housing allowance. Having obtained leave on November 26, 2021, with leave operating as stay, they moved the court for certiorari to quash the eviction decision and prohibition to restrain their eviction, contending breaches of section 31 of the Employment Act, Articles 43(1)(b) and 47 of the Constitution. The respondents, through a replying affidavit sworn by their County Attorney, opposed the application, asserting prior notices since September 2020 and that housing was not a term of employment. The court framed two issues: whether the decision warranted judicial review, and whether the reliefs should issue. Applying the established grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety, the court found the decision illegal as contrary to section 31 of the Employment Act, irrational because of the short notice period and absence of alternative accommodation, and procedurally improper because the applicants were condemned unheard. Certiorari quashed the eviction notice of October 14, 2021 and consequential orders; prohibition restrained the respondents from evicting the applicants save through lawful means - valid reason, reasonable notice and written indication of housing allowance. Costs were awarded to the applicants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the decision to evict the applicants from staff quarters warranted judicial review

Holding

The decision was illegal, irrational and procedurally improper and was quashed.

Reasoning

The decision contravened section 31 of the Employment Act, which obliges an employer to provide housing or pay housing allowance, and threatened the applicants' right to accessible and adequate housing under Article 43(1)(b) of the Constitution. The notice period was under a month, no alternative housing or allowance was offered, and the applicants were not heard before the decision was made, condemning them unheard contrary to natural justice.

p. 6
02

Whether certiorari and prohibition should issue

Holding

Both orders issued since the decision was tainted with illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety.

Reasoning

Relying on KNEC v Republic Ex Parte Gathenji Njoroge, certiorari quashes a decision already made where the rules of natural justice were not complied with, while prohibition restrains further action in furtherance of the impugned decision. Having established the grounds for review, the applicants were entitled to both orders, with liberty for the respondents to act lawfully in future.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Every employee is entitled to either housing provided by the employer or, in the alternative, a reasonable house allowance.
  • An employer's power to allocate staff housing must be exercised fairly and lawfully; eviction without a hearing offends the rules of natural justice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Certiorari issued quashing the Respondent's decision contained in the eviction Notice dated October 14, 2021 and any other consequential orders emanating therefrom.
  2. 2.Prohibition issued against the Respondents, their servants and agents, prohibiting them from evicting the Applicants from the staff quarters at Londiani Sub County Hospital or doing any act in furtherance of the impugned decisions.
  3. 3.The respondents are at liberty to remove the applicants from the staff quarters provided it is done lawfully, with valid reason, reasonable notice and payment of housing allowance, which shall be indicated in writing before notice to vacate is served.
  4. 4.The applicants are awarded costs of the suit.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 31(1)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 43(1)(b)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47
  • ELRC (Procedure) RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (8)

  • Republic v Secretary of the firearms Licensing Board and 2 others Ex parte; Senator Johnson Muthama
    [2018] eKLR
  • Richard Were and 11 others v Permanent Secretary Ministry of Health & 3 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • James Opiyo Wandayi v Kenya National Assembly & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Kenya National Examination Council v Republic Ex Parte Geoffrey Gathenji Njoroge & 9 others
    [1997] eKLR
  • Pastoli vs Kabale District Local Government Council & others
    (2008) 2 EA 300
  • Council of Civil Service Union v Minister for the Civil Service
    [1985] AC 2
  • Re An Application by Bukoba Gymkhana Club
    [1963] EA 478
  • Al-Mehdawi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    [1990] AC 876
Jurisdiction invoked
Leave granted on November 26, 2021 to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition in the Employment and Labour Relations Court's supervisory/judicial review jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v County Government of Kericho & another; Oduori & another (Exparte) (Judicial Review E002 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 1370 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application (ELRC, Nakuru), Notice of Motion dated December 1, 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1370/eng@2022-07-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.