Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2022] KEELRC 1298 (KLR)

Mwathi v Collection Agency Limited (Cause 2441 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 1298 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 July 2022
1,588 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ordered an employer to pay house allowance, leave dues, service pay and unremitted statutory deductions, but rejected the overtime claim for lack of proof.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, formerly employed by the Respondent from 5th September 2015 as Legal Officer/In-house Counsel/Litigation Associate at a monthly salary of Kshs. 51,268, claimed unpaid house allowance, untaken leave dues, service pay, overtime, and unremitted statutory deductions (PAYE, NSSF, NHIF), as well as a certificate of service, following her resignation in August 2017. The Respondent admitted the employment but denied the claims, asserting all dues were paid per the contract; however, it did not attend the hearing or file submissions, leaving the Claimant's uncontroverted testimony. The court found the Claimant entitled to house allowance at 15% of salary for one year, compensation for 34 untaken leave days, service pay for two years (given non-remittance of NSSF), and a refund of unremitted statutory dues, including PAYE unlawfully deducted from her as a person living with disability exempt from tax. The overtime claim failed for want of proof, no time sheets or prior demands having been produced, the burden resting on the employee. Judgment was entered for the Claimant with interest - court rates on the service pay, house allowance and leave dues from date of judgment, and commercial rates on the unremitted dues from date of filing suit - plus a certificate of service under Section 51 of the Employment Act and costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

House allowance

Holding

Claimant awarded house allowance at 15% of salary for one year as employer failed to prove payment or a consolidated salary provision

Reasoning

Section 31 of the Employment Act obliges an employer to provide reasonable housing accommodation or a sufficient sum as rent. Section 31(2) only applies where the contract expressly provides a consolidated salary. Following precedent, 15% of salary is the reasonable proportion spent on house rent. The Respondent did not attend or offer testimony, so payment of house allowance was not proved and the Claimant was awarded 15% of salary for one year.

p. 3
02

Overtime

Holding

Overtime claim dismissed for want of proof

Reasoning

Overtime is fluid and varies with hours and days worked. The employee bears the burden of proving that she worked overtime and sought payment for it. The Claimant produced no time sheets and made no demand for overtime during her employment, only raising the claim at the institution of the suit. The head of claim was therefore unproved and disallowed.

p. 3
03

Unremitted statutory deductions

Holding

Claimant awarded unremitted dues including PAYE unlawfully deducted from an exempt person living with disability, and NHIF/NSSF deductions

Reasoning

The Respondent deducted PAYE, NSSF and NHIF but failed to remit them, as shown by the NSSF statement and pay slips tendered uncontroverted. The Claimant, being a person living with disability, was exempt from PAYE; the Respondent knew this and the deduction was unlawful and refundable. Failing to remit deductions to government agencies is an offence, and the deducted sums were awarded to the Claimant.

p. 3
04

Service pay and leave dues

Holding

Service pay for two years and compensation for 34 untaken leave days awarded

Reasoning

Under Section 28 of the Employment Act an employee is entitled to not less than twenty-one working days leave per year. The Claimant's uncontroverted testimony was that of 42 leave days she took only 8, leaving 34 days uncompensated. Service pay is due under Section 35(5) and (6) where the employee has not enjoyed the benefit of statutory deductions; the NSSF statement showed no remittances by the Respondent, entitling her to service pay for the two years worked.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an employer does not provide housing or prove that salary was consolidated to include house allowance, the employee is entitled to 15% of salary as house allowance.
  • PAYE deducted from an employee exempt from tax as a person living with disability must be refunded by the employer.
  • Deducting and failing to remit statutory dues to government agencies is an offence.
  • The burden of proving overtime lies on the employee, who should have claimed it during the contract's pendency.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Kshs. 51,268/- being service pay for the 2 years worked
  2. 2.Kshs. 92,282.40 being house allowance for one year
  3. 3.Kshs. 67,042.77 being leave dues
  4. 4.Kshs. 280,296/- being unremitted dues
  5. 5.Interest on the sums in (i), (ii) and (iii) at Court rates from date of judgment till payment in full
  6. 6.Interest on the sum in (iv) at commercial rates from date of filing suit till payment in full
  7. 7.Certificate of service in terms of Section 51 of the Employment Act
  8. 8.Costs of the suit to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 31 (and 31(2))
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 28
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 35(5) and (6)
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 51

Cases cited (7)

  • Milkah Khakayi Kulati v Sandstorm (Africa) Limited
    [2014] eKLR
  • Grain Pro Kenya Inc. Ltd v Andrew Waithaka Kiragu
    [2019] eKLR
  • Ananna Yonemura v Liwa Kenya Trust
    [2014] eKLR
  • KUDHEIHA Workers v B.O.G Maseno School For The Deaf
    [2013] eKLR
  • Fancy Jeruto Cherop & Another v Hotel Cathay Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Rajab Barasa & 4 Others v Kenya Meat Commission
    [2016] eKLR
  • Martin Ireri Ndwiga v Olerai Management Company
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment claims under the Employment Act, 2007 (specific constitutional/statutory article not cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwathi v Collection Agency Limited (Cause 2441 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 1298 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1298/eng@2022-07-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.