Mwathi v Collection Agency Limited (Cause 2441 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 1298 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court ordered an employer to pay house allowance, leave dues, service pay and unremitted statutory deductions, but rejected the overtime claim for lack of proof.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#House allowance
Claimant awarded house allowance at 15% of salary for one year as employer failed to prove payment or a consolidated salary provision
Section 31 of the Employment Act obliges an employer to provide reasonable housing accommodation or a sufficient sum as rent. Section 31(2) only applies where the contract expressly provides a consolidated salary. Following precedent, 15% of salary is the reasonable proportion spent on house rent. The Respondent did not attend or offer testimony, so payment of house allowance was not proved and the Claimant was awarded 15% of salary for one year.
Overtime
Overtime claim dismissed for want of proof
Overtime is fluid and varies with hours and days worked. The employee bears the burden of proving that she worked overtime and sought payment for it. The Claimant produced no time sheets and made no demand for overtime during her employment, only raising the claim at the institution of the suit. The head of claim was therefore unproved and disallowed.
Unremitted statutory deductions
Claimant awarded unremitted dues including PAYE unlawfully deducted from an exempt person living with disability, and NHIF/NSSF deductions
The Respondent deducted PAYE, NSSF and NHIF but failed to remit them, as shown by the NSSF statement and pay slips tendered uncontroverted. The Claimant, being a person living with disability, was exempt from PAYE; the Respondent knew this and the deduction was unlawful and refundable. Failing to remit deductions to government agencies is an offence, and the deducted sums were awarded to the Claimant.
Service pay and leave dues
Service pay for two years and compensation for 34 untaken leave days awarded
Under Section 28 of the Employment Act an employee is entitled to not less than twenty-one working days leave per year. The Claimant's uncontroverted testimony was that of 42 leave days she took only 8, leaving 34 days uncompensated. Service pay is due under Section 35(5) and (6) where the employee has not enjoyed the benefit of statutory deductions; the NSSF statement showed no remittances by the Respondent, entitling her to service pay for the two years worked.
Legal principles established
#- Where an employer does not provide housing or prove that salary was consolidated to include house allowance, the employee is entitled to 15% of salary as house allowance.
- PAYE deducted from an employee exempt from tax as a person living with disability must be refunded by the employer.
- Deducting and failing to remit statutory dues to government agencies is an offence.
- The burden of proving overtime lies on the employee, who should have claimed it during the contract's pendency.
Court orders
#- 1.Kshs. 51,268/- being service pay for the 2 years worked
- 2.Kshs. 92,282.40 being house allowance for one year
- 3.Kshs. 67,042.77 being leave dues
- 4.Kshs. 280,296/- being unremitted dues
- 5.Interest on the sums in (i), (ii) and (iii) at Court rates from date of judgment till payment in full
- 6.Interest on the sum in (iv) at commercial rates from date of filing suit till payment in full
- 7.Certificate of service in terms of Section 51 of the Employment Act
- 8.Costs of the suit to the Claimant
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment claims under the Employment Act, 2007 (specific constitutional/statutory article not cited in the judgment)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Mwathi v Collection Agency Limited (Cause 2441 of 2017) [2022] KEELRC 1298 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1298/eng@2022-07-13
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.