Oratah v Hornbill Pub Limited (Cause 1781 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 1265 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether leave should be granted to the Claimant to amend the statement of claim after the close of pleadings
Leave to amend was granted; the Respondent's objections of delay and introduction of a new cause of action did not establish prejudice incapable of compensation by costs
The court noted that Rule 14(6) permits post-close-of-pleadings amendments with leave, and that the power is discretionary and to be exercised so as to do what justice requires. Relying on Institute for Social Accountability, the object of amendment is to determine disputes on the true state of facts rather than on false hypotheses of pleaded facts. The Respondent failed to specify any prejudice it would suffer, and would have an opportunity to amend its defence and be heard. Delay was attributed to the Claimant's former counsel.
Whether the Respondent had shown valid grounds to refuse the amendment
The Respondent's grounds of undue delay and sneaking in a time-barred cause of action were rejected because no concrete prejudice was demonstrated
The court held that the Respondent's reasons were not valid reasons to refuse leave. It observed that the Respondent had not stated what prejudice it would suffer should the amendment be granted, and that the Respondent would have an opportunity to amend its defence and to be heard at the hearing, meaning any inconvenience could be compensated.
Legal principles established
#- Amendments should be granted freely provided there are justifiable reasons, no injustice to the other party, and no loss incapable of compensation by costs
- An amendment should be allowed if made in good faith and if it will not prejudice the opposite party in a way that cannot be compensated by costs or otherwise
Court orders
#- 1.Leave granted to the Claimant to amend the memorandum of claim as prayed
- 2.The amended memorandum of claim to be filed and served upon the Respondent within 14 days from the date of the ruling
- 3.Corresponding leave granted to the Respondent to file a reply to the amended claim within 14 days of service
- 4.The costs of the amendment to be borne by the Claimant in any event
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Rule 14(6) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016; Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Oratah v Hornbill Pub Limited (Cause 1781 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 1265 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated on the face of the judgment (Claimant's notice of motion dated 26th October 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1265/eng@2022-07-08
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.