Thiga v Unga Limited (Cause 2311 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 1170 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Existence of an appeal or intended appeal as a foundation for stay
There being no notice of appeal and no prayer for leave to file one out of time, there is no appeal to warrant stay of execution pending appeal.
The court observed that by the time the application was filed, the 14-day period for filing a notice of appeal under the Court of Appeal Rules had lapsed and there was no application for extension of time. Without a notice of appeal, there is no appeal against the judgment and decree, and therefore no basis for stay of execution pending appeal.
Unreasonable delay in bringing the application
The 28-day delay in filing the application, despite being advised at judgment delivery to file a formal application, constituted inordinate delay.
Counsel for the Applicant was advised by the court at the time of delivery of judgment to file a formal application for stay. She waited 28 days and only filed after the decree holder demanded payment by letter dated 7th October 2021. The court held this demonstrated inordinate delay, one of the conditions under Order 42 Rule 6(2) that the applicant must satisfy.
Failure to offer security for the due performance of the decree
The Applicant offered no security for the due performance of the decree, a mandatory condition under Order 42 Rule 6(2)(b).
The court noted that no offer of security appeared in the application, the supporting affidavit, or the Applicant's submissions. Since Order 42 Rule 6(2) requires that such security as the court orders for the due performance of the decree be given by the applicant, the failure to offer any security was a further independent ground for dismissing the application.
Legal principles established
#- An application for stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6(2) fails where no notice of appeal has been filed, where the application is brought after inordinate delay, and where no security for the due performance of the decree is offered.
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 8th October 2021 seeking stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 10th September 2021 is dismissed
- 2.The Applicant to pay costs of the application to the Claimant/Decree Holder
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Thiga v Unga Limited (Cause 2311 of 2016) [2022] KEELRC 1170 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1170/eng@2022-05-06
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.