Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2022] KEELRC 1057 (KLR)

James Kala Ngolya v Registered Trustees of Nairobi Club [2022] KEELRC 1057 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 January 2022
1,138 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled an employer cannot escape a lawsuit just because it was misnamed in the court documents.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi, delivered virtually on 20 January 2022 by Linnet Ndolo J, determines a Preliminary Objection raised by the Respondent by notice dated 27 July 2021. The Respondent contended that there is no entity registered under the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act, Cap. 164 known as the Registered Trustees of Nairobi Club, and consequently no Respondent in law against whom the orders sought in the claim could be directed. Both parties filed written submissions and relied on the classic definition of a preliminary objection in Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors. The court observed that the objection, on its face, required ascertainment of facts - namely the actual institutional form of Nairobi Club - and therefore could not qualify as a pure point of law. Drawing on the Court of Appeal decisions in Munjuri and Gitonga, the court held that the burden lay on the party alleging non-registration to prove it, and the Respondent failed to disclose the true legal form of the employer. The court further held that the employment contract between the Claimant and Nairobi Club subsisted and its rights and obligations could not vanish merely because the Respondent may have been misnamed, citing Rika J in the Diani Sea Resort case. Additionally, the Respondent having filed an unconditional Memorandum of Appearance, it had submitted to the court's jurisdiction, relying on Kanti & Co Ltd and Billy Graham Owuor. The Preliminary Objection was found misconceived and overruled with costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a preliminary objection on the non-existence of the named Respondent can succeed

Holding

The Preliminary Objection was misconceived; the employment relationship and contractual obligations cannot vanish merely because the Respondent may have been misnamed.

Reasoning

The court held that the objection raised a factual question rather than a pure point of law, since ascertaining the institutional form of Nairobi Club would require evidence. The record showed an employment contract between the Claimant and Nairobi Club, and the Respondent did not disclose the actual legal form of the employer. Relying on Munjuri and Gitonga, the burden was on the party asserting non-registration to prove it, which the Respondent failed to do.

p. 2
02

Effect of entering an unconditional Memorandum of Appearance

Holding

By filing an unconditional Memorandum of Appearance, the Respondent submitted to the jurisdiction of the court and could not thereafter challenge it.

Reasoning

The court relied on Kanti & Co Ltd v South British Insurance Co Ltd and Billy Graham Owuor to hold that unconditional appearance signifies submission to jurisdiction, which cannot be abrogated unilaterally by the defendant, as the plaintiff acquires a vested interest in that submission.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee cannot lose a claim against an employer merely because the employer has been improperly described or named in the pleadings.
  • A party entering an unconditional Memorandum of Appearance submits to the jurisdiction of the court and cannot unilaterally withdraw that submission.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's Preliminary Objection dated 27th July 2021 is overruled
  2. 2.Costs of the Preliminary Objection to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Trustees (Perpetual Succession) ActCap. 164; Section 33
  • Societies ActNot specified

Cases cited (6)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors
    [1969] E.A 696
  • Grace Mwendwa Munjuri v Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya
    [2017] eKLR
  • Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya v James Gitonga
    [2017] eKLR
  • Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Diani Sea Resort t/a Carslake Nominee Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kanti & Co Ltd v South British Insurance Co Ltd
    [1981] KLR, 6
  • Billy Graham Owuor v Daudi Sabin Bahira & another
    [2012] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over the employment claim (not expressly stated in the ruling)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Kala Ngolya v Registered Trustees of Nairobi Club [2022] KEELRC 1057 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/1057/eng@2022-01-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.