Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 9th September 2021 (arising from CMEL No. 1215 of 2019: Sarah Ochunyi Okuku v Security Seven Limited)· [2022] KEELRC 987 (KLR)

Security Seven Limited v Sarah Ochunyi Okuku [2022] KEELRC 987 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 January 2022
977 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court stopped execution of an employment judgment, but only because the employer agreed to deposit the full awarded amount in a joint account within 45 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Security Seven Limited, the Applicant, moved the Employment and Labour Relations Court by Notice of Motion dated 9th September 2021 seeking stay of execution of the judgment of Hon D.O Mbeja delivered on 23rd July 2021 in CMEL No. 1215 of 2019 (Sarah Ochunyi Okuku v Security Seven Limited), together with leave to appeal out of time. The Applicant, through an affidavit sworn by its Human Resource Manager Boniface Mbuthia Irungu, explained that it learnt of the judgment only when served with warrants of attachment on 2nd September 2021, that neither the judgment nor the decree had been served, and that execution would render any intended appeal nugatory. It also raised concerns about the Respondent's ability to refund the decretal sum should the appeal succeed, while offering security. The Respondent, through a replying affidavit sworn by her Counsel Willis Wetaba Nanjendo, did not oppose stay but insisted any stay be conditional on the entire decretal sum being deposited in an interest-earning account in the joint names of the parties' advocates or in court. The Applicant's supplementary affidavit cited COVID-19-related financial difficulties in depositing the whole sum. The court found the deposit condition reasonable, observing that just as the Applicant feared non-refund of the decretal sum, the Respondent was entitled to security for the fruits of her judgment if the appeal failed. Judge Linnet Ndolo granted leave to appeal out of time, stayed execution conditional on the entire decretal sum being deposited in a joint interest-earning account within 45 days, ordered automatic lapse of stay on default, and made costs of the application costs in the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to grant stay of execution pending intended appeal

Holding

Stay granted subject to deposit of the entire decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account, lapsing automatically if the condition is not met

Reasoning

The Applicant showed substantial loss concerns regarding refundability of the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. The Respondent did not oppose stay but sought security by way of deposit. The court found the deposit condition reasonable as it balances the Applicant's apprehension about refund with the Respondent's legitimate interest in enjoying the fruits of judgment, and imposed a 45-day deadline with automatic lapse on default.

p. 2
02

Whether to grant leave to appeal out of time

Holding

Leave granted

Reasoning

The Applicant explained that it learnt of the judgment only upon being served with warrants of attachment on 2nd September 2021, as neither the judgment nor the decree had been served. The application was said to have been made without unreasonable delay. On these facts the court exercised its discretion to extend time for filing the appeal.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a decree-holder may be unable to refund the decretal sum if an appeal succeeds, the judgment-debtor's concern about the respondent's ability to refund is balanced by the respondent's interest in securing the fruits of judgment, justifying conditional stay with a deposit of the decretal sum

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave to appeal out of time is granted
  2. 2.Stay of execution of the judgment delivered by Hon D.O Mbeja on 23rd July 2021 in CMEL No. 1215 of 2019, subject to the Applicant depositing the entire decretal sum in an interest earning account in the joint names of the parties' Advocates within forty-five (45) days
  3. 3.Failure to adhere to the deposit condition will lead to automatic lapse of the stay
  4. 4.Costs of the application to be costs in the appeal
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (CMEL No. 1215 of 2019)
CMEL No. 1215 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent and appellate jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over appeals from subordinate courts in employment matters (leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution pending appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Security Seven Limited v Sarah Ochunyi Okuku [2022] KEELRC 987 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Notice of Motion dated 9th September 2021 (arising from CMEL No. 1215 of 2019: Sarah Ochunyi Okuku v Security Seven Limited). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/987/eng@2022-01-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.