Kenya National Union of Nurses v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender Affairs & 3 others [2022] KEELRC 913 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court confirmed it can hear constitutional petitions about workplace rights, so employees challenging public service policies must file there.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the E&LRC, rather than the High Court, has jurisdiction over a petition challenging performance measurement tools in the public service
The preliminary objection fails; the E&LRC has jurisdiction over the petition as it involves employment in the public service.
Relying on a line of authority beginning with the Court of Appeal's decision in Daniel N. Mugendi v. Kenyatta University, the court held that matters relating to fundamental rights in employment and labour relations fall exclusively within the E&LRC's jurisdiction under Article 165(5)(b). That jurisprudence has been consistently applied, including in Bernard Odero Okello. The petition involves public service employment, the Public Service Commission, the National Employment Authority and performance measurement tools, squarely engaging the E&LRC's mandate.
Legal principles established
#- The E&LRC has exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional litigation concerning fundamental rights in employment and labour relations matters.
Court orders
#- 1.The Preliminary Objection has no merit and is declined
- 2.No order on the costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2) and Article 165(5)(b) of the Constitution read with Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya National Union of Nurses v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender Affairs & 3 others [2022] KEELRC 913 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/913/eng@2022-02-03
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.