Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1272 of 2017· [2022] KEELRC 733 (KLR)

Joseph Kipkurui Maritim v Transfleet Limited [2022] KEELRC 733 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 February 2022
1,035 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded a former security officer Kshs.1,104,600 in terminal dues after his employer ignored the case, proving payslips and memos can win employment claims.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent on 6th May 1992 as a Security Officer and rising to Chief Security Officer, averred that his employment was arbitrarily terminated on 2nd November 2016 without just cause, and that the Respondent failed to pay his terminal dues despite issuing a tabulation of the amount due. He sought Kshs.1,104,600/- being his terminal benefits, costs of the suit, and interest at court rates. The Respondent, though served, did not enter appearance or file a defence, so the claim proceeded undefended, with the Claimant filing a witness affidavit and written submissions. The Court framed two issues: whether an employer-employee relationship existed, and whether the Claimant was entitled to the reliefs sought. Applying Monica Kanini Mutua v Al-Arafat Shopping Centre & another [2018] eKLR, the Court held that in an undefended claim the claimant must establish the employment relationship as a preliminary issue. Relying on a salary increment memo of 21st January 2014, a March 2014 pay slip, a staff list of the security department as at March 2016, and the Respondent's own tabulation of the final account, the Court found the employment relationship proved. On entitlement, the Court noted the Claimant sought no compensation for unfair termination, only release of the tabulated terminal benefits. Unrebutted by any evidence from the Respondent, the claim succeeded. The Court awarded Kshs.1,104,600/- as terminal benefits, plus costs of the suit and interest at court rates from the date of filing suit until settlement in full.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of an employer-employee relationship

Holding

The Claimant proved the employment relationship through documentary evidence including a salary increment memo, pay slip, staff list and tabulation of final dues.

Reasoning

As an undefended claim, the Court had to first confirm an employment relationship before determining entitlement. The Claimant relied on a memo from the Respondent's Personnel & Administration Officer dated 21st January 2014 on salary increment, a March 2014 pay slip, a list of the Respondent's members of staff in the security department as at March 2016, and the tabulation of final account prepared by the Respondent. The Court found these documents sufficient proof of employment.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to terminal benefits

Holding

The Claimant was awarded Kshs.1,104,600/- as terminal benefits as tabulated by the Respondent, plus costs and interest.

Reasoning

The Claimant relied on the tabulation of terminal dues prepared by the Respondent itself and attached to the Statement of Claim. With no evidence from the Respondent to rebut the claim, the Court found the Claimant entitled to the tabulated terminal benefits as prayed, and awarded costs and interest given that the sums were terminal benefits payable at termination.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • In an undefended claim, the claimant must establish all the facts of the claim, including the existence of an employment relationship as a preliminary issue before proving unfair termination.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award of Kshs.1,104,600/- as terminal benefits to the Claimant
  2. 2.Costs of the suit awarded to the Claimant
  3. 3.Interest on the award at Court rates from the date of filing suit until settlement in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)Section 1B

Cases cited (1)

  • Monica Kanini Mutua v Al-Arafat Shopping Centre & another
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution (Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Kipkurui Maritim v Transfleet Limited [2022] KEELRC 733 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Cause No. 1272 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/733/eng@2022-02-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.