Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition filed 5th February 2021 (E&LR Petition, Nairobi)· [2022] KEELRC 713 (KLR)

Association of Public Health Officers (Aphok) Nairobi Branch v Director General Nairobi Metropolitan Services & 5 others; Josephine Kibaru Mbae & 4 others (Interested parties) [2022] KEELRC 713 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 February 2022
3,131 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a health officers' union challenge to staff deployments because the association proved no authority to sue and pleaded no specific rights violations.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petition, filed on 5th February 2021 by the Association of Public Health Officers (APHOK) Nairobi Branch and Brown Ashira Olaly, challenged transfers/deployments of over 300 Public Health Officers under Nairobi Metropolitan Services and the acting appointments of Margaret Sunguti and Raphael Muli as Head and Deputy Head of the Division of Environmental Health. The petitioners alleged violation of Sections of the Public Service Commission Act, HR Manual provisions and various constitutional articles, seeking quashing orders, declarations of unconstitutionality and a review of the Scheme of Service. The respondents, through Kang'ethe Thuku, Deputy Director General, explained that health functions had been transferred to the National Government under a Deed of Transfer, staff were seconded to NMS, and the impugned posting was a normal deployment, not a transfer; they also filed a further affidavit and preliminary objection contending the members disowned the petition and the association lacked capacity. The Court framed four issues: jurisdiction, locus standi, demonstration of rights violation, and entitlement to reliefs. It found it had jurisdiction under Section 12 of the ELRC Act and Article 162(1) of the Constitution, but held the petitioner lacked locus standi, as no authority from affected members was filed and allegations of fraudulent extraction of a 2017 member list went unanswered. The petition also failed the Anarita Karimi precision threshold and the exhaustion doctrine. The complaint on the acting appointments failed since no substantive appointments had been made. The petition was dismissed in its entirety with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELRC over deployment and appointment of seconded health staff

Holding

Court has jurisdiction; appointment and deployment of staff fall within Section 12 ELRC Act

Reasoning

The Court held that issues of appointment and deployment of staff are within the jurisdiction conferred by Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2014 and Article 162(1) of the Constitution, and had no difficulty finding jurisdiction despite the devolution-related context of the Nairobi Metropolitan Services.

p. 4
02

Locus standi of the petitioner association

Holding

Petitioner lacked locus standi; no authority from affected members filed and authority specifically challenged and unanswered

Reasoning

Following its own decision in Association of Public Health Officers of Kenya v Narok County Chief Officer, the Court found that no letter of authority from the alleged affected members was filed. The further replying affidavit alleged the member list was fraudulently extracted from a 2017 document, allegations which went unanswered, so the petitioner failed to establish authority to litigate on behalf of the deployed employees.

p. 4
03

Precision of constitutional pleadings

Holding

Petition failed the Anarita Karimi/Mumo Matemu threshold

Reasoning

The Court found the petition did not disclose with specificity how the rights of the deployed employees were threatened or violated, lacking any specific pleadings regarding individual employees or how the impugned deployment letter violated their rights.

p. 4
04

Exhaustion of internal dispute resolution mechanisms

Holding

Public service grievance mechanisms should be exhausted before approaching the Court

Reasoning

Relying on Court of Appeal and ELRC precedent, the Court noted that the County Governments Act and Public Service Act provide appeal mechanisms for such disputes, which ought to have been used first before invoking the constitutional route.

p. 5
05

Appointments of 3rd and 4th interested parties

Holding

Complaint dismissed; positions only occupied in acting capacity pending advertisement

Reasoning

The respondents' unchallenged evidence was that no substantive appointments had been made and the officers held the positions in acting capacity. The petitioners adduced no evidence that the officers were unqualified or that rights were violated.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • An association must demonstrate authority/consent from the employees it purports to represent to have locus standi
  • A petition alleging constitutional violation must plead with precision the provisions violated and the manner of violation
  • Where a clear procedure for redress of a grievance is prescribed by statute, it should be strictly followed before resorting to court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is dismissed in its entirety
  2. 2.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 10(2), 27(1), 47, 73(2)(a), 129, 152(4)(e), 162(1), 189, 232(1)(d)(f)(g)(i), 234(5), 236
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12
  • Public Service Commission ActSections 31, 43
  • County Governments ActSection 77
  • Public Service Commission, Human Resource Policies and Procedures Manual for the Public ServiceClause B.30; Sections B.4, B.19
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Cases cited (9)

  • Association of Public Health Officers of Kenya –vs- Narok County Chief Officer, Medical Services & 2 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Mumo Matemu –v- Trusted Society of Human Rights
  • Anarita Karimi case
  • Martin Kabubii Mwangi versus County Government of Laikipia
    2019 eKLR
  • Secretary, County Public Service & Another v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille
  • James Tinai Murete & Others vs County Government of Kajiado and others
    Civil Case No. 283 of 2014
  • County Public Service Board versus Hlbhai Gedi Abdille
    (2017) eKLR
  • Speaker of the National Assembly –vs- James Njenga Karume
    (1992) eKLR
  • High Court Employment and Labour Relations Court Petition No. 52 of 2020
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2014 and Article 162(1) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Association of Public Health Officers (Aphok) Nairobi Branch v Director General Nairobi Metropolitan Services & 5 others; Josephine Kibaru Mbae & 4 others (Interested parties) [2022] KEELRC 713 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Petition filed 5th February 2021 (E&LR Petition, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/713/eng@2022-02-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.