Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 21st December, 2021 (ELRC at Kisumu)· [2022] KEELRC 448 (KLR)

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union & another v Mayfair Holdings Ltd (Imperial Hotel) [2022] KEELRC 448 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 March 2022
735 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court set aside a union-negotiated settlement because the worker never received the money, allowing his claim to proceed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu on a Notice of Motion dated 21st December 2021 by the 2nd Claimant, Daniel Ochieng Ogayi, seeking review of orders made on 9th December 2021, in which the court had joined him to the suit but declined to set aside a consent order entered between the 1st Claimant (a union) and the Respondent on his behalf. The Applicant contended the consent was entered in bad faith without his consultation, that the consented amount was far below his entitlement, and that he had not received the consent sum from either the 1st Claimant or the Respondent. The 1st Claimant filed grounds of opposition but did not attend the hearing; the Respondent opposed, arguing no new matter had arisen to warrant review. Applying Rule 33 of the ELRC Rules, 2016, the court found no new evidence or apparent error justifying review, but held that the complete breakdown of the relationship between the union and its member, the union's failure to remit the consent sum, and the Applicant's constitutional right to be heard under Article 50(1) constituted sufficient reason to allow the application. The consent order was set aside, the 2nd Claimant was freed to prosecute his claim on the merits, leave to amend his claim was granted, and costs were ordered to abide the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant was entitled to review of the orders of 9th December 2021 and to have the consent order set aside

Holding

The application was allowed despite absence of new evidence or error, because the non-remittance of the consent sum to the Applicant constituted sufficient reason for review; declining it would violate his right to be heard under Article 50(1) of the Constitution.

Reasoning

The court found no new evidence, error or mistake justifying review under Rule 33. However, the 1st Claimant had not remitted the consent sum to the Applicant, continuing to deny him the fruits of the consent. The court treated this non-remittance as 'sufficient reason' under Rule 33, and held that refusing the application would violate the Applicant's constitutional right to be heard. It therefore set aside the consent order and allowed the claim to proceed to hearing on the merits.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Review requires discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, need for clarification, or other sufficient reason under Rule 33 of the ELRC Rules, 2016.
  • An employee has the right to belong to a union and be represented by it, and equally the right to decline such representation.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Consent order entered between the 1st Claimant and the Respondent set aside
  2. 2.The 2nd Claimant set at liberty to process his claim for hearing and determination on the merits
  3. 3.The 2nd Claimant allowed leave to amend his Claim before the same is fixed for hearing
  4. 4.Costs of the application to abide the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Rules, 2016Rule 33
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50(1)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Rules, 2016 (review jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union & another v Mayfair Holdings Ltd (Imperial Hotel) [2022] KEELRC 448 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Notice of Motion dated 21st December, 2021 (ELRC at Kisumu). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/448/eng@2022-03-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.