Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the excerpt· [2022] KEELRC 376 (KLR)

Steven Otieno Munyore v Kuehne & Negel Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 376 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 March 2022
3,911 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled a fixed-term contract expired automatically when the employee missed the renewal notice deadline, but the employer still owed unpaid salary, leave and holiday pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a truck driver, sued the 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent seeking terminal and contractual dues of Kshs. 1,497,399.60 and a declaration that his termination was unfair. He alleged he was first employed by the 1st Respondent in 2014, then by the 2nd Respondent on a one-year contract from 1.5.2015, and was dismissed after a road traffic accident on 24.3.2016 and a disciplinary hearing on 3.5.2016. The 1st Respondent denied any employment relationship, asserting the claimant was outsourced; the 2nd Respondent asserted the contract expired automatically on 30.4.2016 for failure to give one month's notice of renewal. The court framed three issues: identity of the employer, whether there was unfair dismissal or contract expiry, and reliefs. On the evidence, including the 1st Respondent's own tabulation of 2014 allowances, the court found the claimant worked for the 1st Respondent from 2014 to April 2015, but his subsequent employment by the 2nd Respondent from 1.5.2015 ended that relationship. Applying the principle that courts enforce but do not rewrite contracts, the court held the contract commenced on 1.5.2015 (the backdated effective date) and expired automatically on 30.4.2016 because the claimant gave no renewal notice; the unfair termination claim therefore failed. However, the claimant was awarded Kshs. 119,780.30 against the 2nd Respondent for March and April 2016 salary, 25 days' untaken leave, and pay for 9 public holidays worked, with interest at court rates from filing, plus costs from the 2nd Respondent only. Both respondents were directed to issue certificates of service for their respective periods.

Key legal issues

#
01

Identity of the employer

Holding

The claimant worked for the 1st Respondent from 2014 to April 2015, but employment by the 2nd Respondent from 1.5.2015 ended the relationship with the 1st Respondent; thereafter he was the 2nd Respondent's employee alone.

Reasoning

The 1st Respondent's own tabulation document (D-1) showed allowances for months worked by the claimant in 2014, proving he worked for the 1st Respondent before the 2nd Respondent employed him. Once the 2nd Respondent's contract took effect on 1.5.2015, the 1st Respondent ceased to be an employer.

p. 4
02

Unfair dismissal versus expiry of contract

Holding

The contract of 1.5.2015 expired automatically on 30.4.2016 because the claimant did not give the required one month's notice of intention to renew; there was no unfair termination.

Reasoning

Clause 1 of the contract required not less than one month's written notice of intention to negotiate renewal before expiry. The claimant admitted he gave no such notice. The court declined to rewrite the contract and held the disciplinary proceedings of 3.5.2016 were moot since he was no longer an employee.

p. 4
03

Remedies for salary, leave, public holidays, certificate of service

Holding

Claimant awarded March and April 2016 salary, 25 days' leave pay, pay for 9 public holidays worked, and certificates of service from both respondents.

Reasoning

Salary was withheld while awaiting the traffic case. The 2nd Respondent produced no leave records to disprove unused leave. The 2nd Respondent's witness admitted the claimant worked public holidays without proof of payment. Certificates of service are mandatory under section 51 of the Employment Act.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • It is trite law that the court's mandate is only to enforce the contract between the parties and not to rewrite it.
  • Parties commonly sign a contract with a backdated effective date, and the contractual commencement date governs.
  • Gratuity is not statutorily implied as a term of a contract of service in Kenya and must find basis in the contract.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the claimant against the 2nd Respondent in the sum of Kshs. 119,780.30 being salary for March and April 2016, leave days earned and not utilized, and 9 public holidays worked
  2. 2.Award subject to statutory deductions but in addition to interest at court's rate from the date of filing the suit
  3. 3.Claimant to have costs from the 2nd Respondent
  4. 4.The 2nd Respondent directed to issue the claimant with a certificate of service for the period 1.5.2015 to 30.4.2016
  5. 5.The 1st Respondent to issue the claimant with a certificate of service in respect of the period ending 30.4.2015

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Evidence ActSection 78(4)
  • Evidence ActSection 106B(4)
  • Evidence ActSection 106B(1)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 35(1)(b)
  • Employment ActSection 51
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (6)

  • United Airlines Limited V KCB
    [2019] eKLR
  • Esther Nduati Vs Ofyze Limited T/A Harris Tavern
    [2019] eKLR
  • Leah Shighadi Sinoya v Avtech Systems Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Lawrence Ngeki Muiruri Vs Republic
    [2020] eKLR
  • Mohamed Loge Hussein & another V Republic
    [2016] eKLR
  • Republic –vs- Barisa Wayu Matoguda
    (2011) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act and the ELRC Procedure Rules (specific enabling provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Steven Otieno Munyore v Kuehne & Negel Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 376 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/376/eng@2022-03-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.