Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2022] KEELRC 307 (KLR)

Kenya Union Pre-Primary Education Teachers v Secretary, Kirinyaga County Public Service Board & 2 others [2022] KEELRC 307 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
23 March 2022
1,084 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled a trade union cannot sue for workers without a signed recognition agreement with the employer, striking out the claim at the threshold.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 3rd Respondent/Objector raised a preliminary objection dated 21st June 2021 in a dispute filed by a trade union, on two grounds: that it had no recognition agreement with the Claimant union, and that the Claimant had not reported the dispute to the Cabinet Secretary in charge of Trade as required under Section 62 of the Labour Relations Act. The Objectors, in written submissions dated 19th July 2021, argued the court lacked jurisdiction because the union had no locus standi absent a recognition agreement, relying on Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act and authorities including KUEVACO, Communication Workers' Union v Safaricom, and Kenya Shoe & Workers Union v Modern Soap Factory, which hold that an unrecognised union is a bystander. The Claimant, citing the Court of Appeal decision in Modern Soap Factory v Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union, submitted that a registered union whose constitution empowers it may sue for its members, that union membership is a question of fact not amenable to a preliminary objection, and that conflicting ELRC decisions existed. In a judgment delivered at Nyeri on 23rd March 2022, Marete J allowed the preliminary objection, holding that a recognition agreement is primal in any relationship between an employer and a union and that none existed here. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. The judgment contains an internal contradiction, initially appearing to accept the Claimant's case before rejecting it.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a trade union without a recognition agreement has locus standi to institute a claim on behalf of its members

Holding

The preliminary objection was allowed; the court held that without a recognition agreement the union cannot maintain the claim

Reasoning

The Objectors relied on Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act and authorities holding that an unrecognised union is a bystander. Although the Claimant invoked the Court of Appeal decision in Modern Soap Factory supporting union standing, the court rejected that line, holding that a recognition agreement is fundamental to the employer-union relationship. The objection was upheld as a point of law on the absence of a recognition agreement.

p. 2
02

Whether the preliminary objection raises pure points of law

Holding

The court entertained and allowed the objection notwithstanding the Claimant's submission that it required evidence

Reasoning

The Claimant argued the objection raised factual questions not amenable to preliminary determination, citing the Court of Appeal's observation that union membership is a question of fact. The court nonetheless resolved the matter on the basis of the absence of a recognition agreement and allowed the objection.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A recognition agreement is primal in any relationship between an employer and a union; a union without one lacks standing to prosecute a trade dispute

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection dated 21st June 2021 is allowed
  2. 2.Each party bears their own costs of the preliminary objection

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSection 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 54(6)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 62

Cases cited (4)

  • Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organisations (KUEVACO) v Board of Governors & Maina Wanjigi Secondary School
    (2015) eKLR
  • Communication Workers' Union v Safaricom Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Kenya Shoe & Workers Union v Modern Soap Factory Ltd
    Mombasa ELRC Cause No.241 of 2017
  • Modern Soap Factory v Kenya Shoe and Leather Workers Union
    Civil Appeal No.37 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 54 and 62 of the Labour Relations Act (locus standi of trade unions without recognition agreements)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union Pre-Primary Education Teachers v Secretary, Kirinyaga County Public Service Board & 2 others [2022] KEELRC 307 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/307/eng@2022-03-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.