Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherCause No. 1801 of 2016· [2022] KEELRC 196 (KLR)

Vignir Demuson v Marriott Drilling Africa Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 196 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 April 2022
6,676 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~27 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed an unfair termination claim because the employee's contract required disputes to be heard in English courts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, an Icelandic national, was employed by the 2nd Respondent (a UK company) as Country Manager for Kenya effective 29th April 2013 and seconded to the 1st Respondent. His employment was terminated on grounds of redundancy on 2nd February 2016. He claimed declarations of statutory breach (contrary to sections 40(1) and 45(1) of the Employment Act and the NSSF Act), unfair termination, unlawful redundancy, and multiple monetary reliefs including 12 months' damages, salary arrears, performance bonus, pension contributions, service pay and severance pay. The Respondents denied the claim, asserting the 1st Respondent was not party to the employment contract, that UK law governed, and that the redundancy was lawful and fully compensated. The Court framed three issues: jurisdiction, fairness of termination, and entitlement to reliefs. On jurisdiction, it held that the employment contract contained an exclusive clause conferring jurisdiction on English courts and electing English law as the governing law. Applying Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' and the Madan JA factors as restated in Five Forty Aviation, the Court found no sufficiently strong or exceptional reasons to depart from the clause: the evidence was documentary and available online, English law applied, and both parties were closely connected to the UK. The Claimant's reliance on authorities where no governing law or forum had been agreed was distinguished, and the Respondents' objection to jurisdiction in their defence defeated any claim of waiver by unconditional appearance. The Court held it had no jurisdiction to proceed and downed its tools, with each party bearing its own costs. The substantive fairness of the termination was not determined.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELRC has jurisdiction over an employment contract with an exclusive English jurisdiction clause performed in Kenya

Holding

The Court held it has no jurisdiction; the exclusive English jurisdiction and governing law clause must be honoured and the Claimant demonstrated no sufficiently strong reasons to depart from it

Reasoning

The Court applied the Lillian S test and the Madan JA factors in Five Forty Aviation: the evidence was exclusively documentary and available online, English law applied as agreed, both parties were closely connected to the UK, and the employer was a UK resident. The Claimant did not raise concerns about trial in the UK, and entering appearance while objecting to jurisdiction was not a waiver. The Court therefore downed its tools.

p. 9
02

Whether the Respondents waived the exclusive jurisdiction clause by entering appearance

Holding

No waiver was found because the Respondents expressly objected to the Court's jurisdiction in their memorandum of defence

Reasoning

The Claimant relied on Universal Pharmacy, where unconditional appearance and failure to object amounted to waiver. The Court found those circumstances distinguishable: in this case the Respondents objected to jurisdiction in the memorandum of defence filed on 8th November 2016, so submission was not established.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • An exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause in a contract must normally be obeyed and departure requires sufficiently strong exceptional reasons
  • Jurisdiction is a threshold issue that may be raised at any point in proceedings and courts must down tools where jurisdiction is absent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Court held it has no jurisdiction to proceed and downed its tools
  2. 2.Parties to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 48
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court ActSection 12
  • Employment Act, 2007Sections 2, 40(1)(a), (b) and (c), 43(2), 45(1), 47(5)
  • National Social Security Fund Act, No. 45 of 2013Section 20(1)
  • National Social Fund Act (repealed), Chapter 258Sections 10, 11 and 12
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B

Cases cited (25)

  • The Owners of the Motor Vessel "Lillian S" v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    [1989] KLR 1
  • Mercy Kirito Mutegi v Beatrice Nkatha Nyaga & 2 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Tabitha Wambui Munyao & 7 Others v Peter Ngugi Kainamia & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Karachi Gas Co. Limited v Isaaq
    (1965) E.A. 42
  • M. G Radia v Transocean (Uganda) Ltd
    [1975] eKLR
  • Fairdeal Upvc Aluminium & Glass Ltd v Ase Europe N.V
    (2020) eKLR
  • Petra Development Services Limited v Evergreen Marine (Singapore) PTE Ltd & Another
    (2014) eKLR
  • Universal Pharmacy (K) Limited v Pacific International Lines (PTE) Limited & another
    [2015] eKLR
  • National Bank of Kenya Ltd v Pipeplastic Samkolit (K) Ltd & another
    (2001) eKLR
  • Dorcas Kemunto Wainana v IPAS
    (2018) eKLR
  • Kleinhans v Parmalat SA (Pty) Ltd
    (2002) ILJ 1418
  • David Barasa v British Peace Support Team & another
    (2016) eKLR
  • Mary Nyangasi Ratemo & 9 others v Kenya Police Staff Sacco Limited & another
    (2013) eKLR
  • Kenya Airways Limited v Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya & 3 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Caroline Atieno Osweto v Kenya Yungheng Plate Making Limited
    (2013) eKLR
  • Kennedy Maina Mirera v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Kenya Broadcasting Corporation v Geoffrey Wakio
    (2019) eKLR
  • Kenya National Private Security Workers Union v Kenya Kazi Security Services Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • Caroline Wanjiru Luzze v Nestle Equatorial African Region Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • Hesbon Ngaruiya Waigi v Equatorial Commercial Bank Limited
    (2013) eKLR
  • Arnold v Britton
    [2015] UKSC 36
  • Five Forty Aviation Limited v Lonzim Air (BVI) Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • United India Insurance Company Ltd v East African Underwriters (Kenya) Ltd
    [1985] KLR
  • Areva T & D India Limited v Priority Electrical Engineers & Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • The Makefjell
    [1976] 2 Lloyds Reports 29
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act; suit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under the contract's exclusive English jurisdiction clause

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Vignir Demuson v Marriott Drilling Africa Limited & another [2022] KEELRC 196 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2022). Cause No. 1801 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2022/196/eng@2022-04-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.