Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. E085 of 2021 (Consolidated with Cause No. E066 of 2021 and Cause No. E101 of 2021)· [2021] KEELRC 2307 (KLR)

Kenya National Union of Nurses & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health & 95 others; Attorney General (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 2307 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 November 2021
2,588 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court quashed a Health Ministry circular that stopped nurses' union dues, ruling only the Labour Cabinet Secretary can suspend lawful dues deductions.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This consolidated judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Ndolo J) dealt with three causes — E066 and E085 of 2021 by the Kenya National Union of Nurses and E101 of 2021 by the Kenya National Union of Clinical Officers — consolidated by order of 25 February 2021 with E085 of 2021 as the lead file. The claims challenged a Circular dated 22 December 2020 from the Cabinet Secretary for Health instructing the Ministry of Public Service and Gender that the Ministry and County Governments would not play the agency role of remitting union dues to health sector unions. The Respondents argued the claims were frivolous and res sub judice on account of the earlier KMPDU Transition Authority case, and that members are county government employees. The court held the claims were not res sub judice, the earlier case being determined and the subject matter wholly different. On the merits, the court found a subsisting Ministerial Order (Legal Notice No. 160 of 2018) under Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act requiring employers to deduct and remit union dues, and held that only the Labour Cabinet Secretary could revoke or suspend it under Section 50(2) on limited grounds, following Rika J in KNUN v Kilifi County Public Service Board. The Circular was declared null and void. The court quashed the Circular, stopped its implementation, and declared that the 1st and 2nd Respondents had no capacity to direct County Public Service Boards on dues deduction; the claim for payment of money lost failed for want of proof. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claims were res sub judice by virtue of the earlier Transition Authority (KMPDU) case

Holding

Not res sub judice; the earlier case was determined and the subject matter here is unconnected to it

Reasoning

The Respondents argued the claims duplicated the KMPDU ex parte suit on transfer of health services to counties. The court found the cited case already determined and that the present subject matter — the legality of a circular stopping deduction and remittance of union dues — has no connection, even remote, with the subject matter of the Transition Authority case. The res sub judice ingredients, including same subject matter, were not met.

p. 7
02

Whether the Cabinet Secretary for Health could, by circular, stop deduction and remittance of union dues under a subsisting Ministerial Order (Legal Notice No. 160 of 2018)

Holding

The Circular was null and void; only the Cabinet Secretary for Labour may revoke or suspend a Section 48 Order under Section 50(2) on the limited statutory grounds

Reasoning

Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act allows a trade union to obtain a Ministerial Order compelling employers to deduct dues, and Section 50(2) reserves revocation or suspension to the Labour Minister on narrow grounds. Rika J's decision in KNUN v Kilifi County Public Service Board affirmed this. The Circular flew in the face of clear statute and no consultation could save it.

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a Ministerial Order under Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act issues, an employer must commence deductions, and only the issuing Labour Cabinet Secretary may revoke or suspend it under Section 50(2) on the specified grounds; no other authority may halt the Order

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Circular Ref: MOH/HRM&D/IPPD/SM/(30) dated 22nd December 2020 is hereby quashed
  2. 2.Implementation of the said Circular dated 22nd December 2020 is stopped
  3. 3.A declaration that the 1st and 2nd Respondents have no legal capacity to issue directives to County Public Service Boards regarding deduction and remittance of trade union dues on account of the Claimants' members
  4. 4.The claim for payment of money lost as a result of the Circular fails for want of proof
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over trade union dues disputes under the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya National Union of Nurses & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health & 95 others; Attorney General (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 2307 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause No. E085 of 2021 (Consolidated with Cause No. E066 of 2021 and Cause No. E101 of 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/2307/eng@2021-11-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.