Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedELRC Cause, Nairobi (Memorandum of Claim dated and filed 29th September 2016)· [2021] KEELRC 2242 (KLR)

Kenya Building Construction Timber and Furniture Industries Employees Union v Imara Enterprises Limited [2021] KEELRC 2242 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
29 January 2021
2,007 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded a dismissed worker Kshs.388,436 after finding his employer fired him without a valid reason or a fair hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant trade union sued on behalf of its member, Godfrey Were Ludenyo, a former turn boy/driver's mate of the Respondent company, alleging unlawful and unfair termination of employment on 11th June 2014 and claiming terminal benefits of Kshs.445,518 comprising notice pay, leave, prorata leave, service pay and underpaid wages, plus compensation, costs and any other relief. The Respondent, though served, did not enter appearance or file a defence, so the claim proceeded undefended on the grievant's witness affidavit and the Claimant's written submissions. The court framed three issues: existence of an employment relationship, fairness of the termination, and entitlement to reliefs. Relying on the grievant's NSSF Member Statement of Account, the court found the employment relationship proved, noting that in an undefended claim the claimant bears the burden of establishing all facts. On fairness, the court held that hearing and notification under Section 41 and a valid reason under Section 43 of the Employment Act are mandatory, and in the absence of any controverting evidence found the dismissal substantively and procedurally unfair. On remedies, the court recalculated underpayments for 2012 to 2014 only (Kshs.22,486), awarded one month's notice pay (Kshs.14,638) for want of evidence of a two-month term, granted 12 months' compensation (Kshs.175,656) and leave pay (Kshs.175,656), but refused service pay because the grievant was an NSSF member. Judgment was entered for the grievant in the total sum of Kshs.388,436, with costs and interest at court rates from the date of judgment until settlement in full.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of an employment relationship in an undefended claim

Holding

The claimant proved the employment relationship through the grievant's NSSF Member Statement of Account showing the Respondent as employer.

Reasoning

Under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act the burden of proving unfair termination rests on the employee. In an undefended suit the claimant must prove all facts including the employment relationship. The NSSF Member Statement of Account for the period to 31st December 2013 indicated the Respondent as the grievant's employer, and the evidence was uncontroverted, satisfying the burden.

p. 3
02

Fairness of the termination

Holding

The termination was unfair: no valid reason was shown and the mandatory hearing and notification requirements of Section 41 were not met.

Reasoning

Hearing and notification before termination are mandatory under Section 41 of the Employment Act, and under Section 43 the employer must prove a valid reason. The Respondent did not participate and there was no evidence controverting the grievant's averments that no reasons or hearing preceded the termination, so the dismissal failed both substantive and procedural fairness tests.

p. 3
03

Remedies payable

Holding

Underpayments for 2012-2014, one month's notice pay, 12 months' compensation for unfair termination and leave pay awarded; service pay refused because the grievant was an NSSF member.

Reasoning

The court recalculated underpayments strictly per the Regulation of Wages (General) (Amendment) Order for 2012 to 2014. Notice was limited to one month absent evidence of a two-month contract term. Compensation was set at 12 months' salary given length of service and no contributory conduct. Leave pay was awarded in absence of employer records, and service pay was excluded by NSSF membership.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • In an undefended claim, the claimant must establish all the facts of the claim, including the existence of an employment relationship, as a preliminary issue.
  • For a termination to pass the fairness test, there must be both substantive justification and procedural fairness.
  • It is the employer's duty to keep records including annual leave taken and leave due, and to produce them in legal proceedings.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the grievant's termination was unlawful and unfair
  2. 2.Payment of underpayments of Kshs.22,486.00
  3. 3.Payment of pay in lieu of notice of Kshs.14,638.00
  4. 4.Compensation for unlawful termination of Kshs.175,656.00 (12 months' salary)
  5. 5.Payment for leave earned but not taken of Kshs.175,656.00
  6. 6.Total award of Kshs.388,436.00 in favour of the grievant
  7. 7.Costs of the suit to the Claimant with interest at court rates from the date of Judgment until settlement in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 41, 43, 45, 47(5), 49, 36
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 159(2)(d), 48
  • Regulation of Wages (General) (Amendment) Order / Building and Construction Wages OrderWage orders effective 1st February 2012
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya)Section 1B

Cases cited (6)

  • Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers Union v Jet Bar Cottage
    (2014) eKLR
  • Monica Kanini Mutua v Al-Arafat Shopping Centre & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Herman Ilangarwa Shidakwa v Armati Security Solutions Limited
    [2019] eKLR
  • Elijah Kipkoros Tonui v Ngara Opticians T/A Bright Eyes Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
    (2013) eKLR
  • Meshack Kiio Ikulume v Prime Fuels Kenya Limited
    (2013) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution read with Section 41, 43, 45, 47(5), 49 and 36 of the Employment Act, 2007 (employment and labour relations jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Building Construction Timber and Furniture Industries Employees Union v Imara Enterprises Limited [2021] KEELRC 2242 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELRC Cause, Nairobi (Memorandum of Claim dated and filed 29th September 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/2242/eng@2021-01-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.