Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition (Homa Bay; Constitutional Petition) - number not stated in judgment· [2021] KEELRC 1737 (KLR)

Michael Kojo Otieno & another v Homa Bay County Assembly [2021] KEELRC 1737 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
19 May 2021
1,714 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyans challenging county hiring decisions must first appeal to the Public Service Commission before going to court, or the court will throw the case out.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Michael Kojo Otieno and Evance Otieno Oloo Gor petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu challenging the nomination and approval of four Chief Officers by the County Public Service Board and County Assembly of Homa Bay, alleging that some shortlisted persons had not applied for the positions. They sought declarations that the law had been violated and the September 2019 advert was void, plus orders for a fresh advert and a transparent redo of the exercise. The County Assembly raised a preliminary objection on capacity, non-joinder, exhaustion of remedies, and jurisdiction. The Court dismissed the preliminary objection on 8 December 2020 without hearing submissions, but later considered it after parties filed submissions. On jurisdiction, the Court held that under section 77 of the County Governments Act read with section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act, a person challenging county recruitment, selection and appointment must first appeal to the Public Service Commission, following the Court of Appeal's binding decision in Secretary, County Public Service Board & Anor v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille. The Court also observed that the Board was a necessary party whose omission would have defeated the orders sought, and that the four nominees should have been joined. On capacity, the Court found the County Assembly is capable of being sued, being a person under Article 258 of the Constitution. Declining jurisdiction, the Court dismissed the petition on 19 May 2021, noting it was brought in the public interest, and ordered each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Court has jurisdiction over a petition challenging county chief officer recruitment and approval proceedings brought without first appealing to the Public Service Commission

Holding

The Court declined jurisdiction; the petitioners were obliged to exhaust the appellate procedure before the Public Service Commission under section 77 of the County Governments Act read with sections 85-89 of the Public Service Commission Act

Reasoning

Section 77(2)(a) of the County Governments Act expressly covers decisions on recruitment, selection, appointment and qualifications attached to any office, making the Commission the first port of call. Section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act prohibits filing proceedings in court on such matters before exhausting the statutory procedure. The Court of Appeal's decision in Secretary, County Public Service Board & Anor v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille endorses exhaustion and binds this Court.

p. 4
02

Whether the failure to join the County Public Service Board and the four nominated chief officers was fatal

Holding

The Board was a necessary party as the body that generated the nominees, and the four nominees should also have been joined since the orders sought could adversely affect them

Reasoning

The County Assembly did not itself generate the names of the nominees; they were the product of a process conducted by the County Public Service Board. Orders annulling the process would affect the Board and the nominees directly, so both were necessary parties whose absence would have compelled the Court to decline the orders sought.

p. 4
03

Whether the County Assembly has capacity to be sued

Holding

The objection was not determinative; a County Assembly is recognised under Article 176 and qualifies as a person under Article 258, which includes unincorporated bodies of persons

Reasoning

Although the Assembly argued it was not a legal person capable of being sued, Article 258 of the Constitution defines a person to include a body of persons incorporated or unincorporated, and Article 176 recognises county assemblies. The objection therefore could not defeat the petition on capacity grounds.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A person dissatisfied with the recruitment, selection or appointment of county public officers must first appeal to the Public Service Commission under section 77 of the County Governments Act before approaching the Court; section 87(2) of the Public Service Commission Act bars legal proceedings until that procedure is exhausted
  • A County Assembly, though not a body corporate in the ordinary sense, is capable of being sued as a person within the meaning of Article 258 of the Constitution

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Court declines jurisdiction
  2. 2.The Petition is dismissed
  3. 3.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 176
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 258
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 10
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 232
  • County Governments ActSection 77 (including s.77(2)(a))
  • County Governments ActSection 35(3)(d)
  • Public Service Commission ActSections 85, 86, 87 (including s.87(2)), 88, 89
  • Public Appointments (County Assemblies Approval) Act2017
  • Statutory Instruments ActNot specified

Cases cited (1)

  • Secretary, County Public Service Board & Anor v Hulbhai Gedi Abdille
    (2017) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (including Articles 176, 258, 10 and 232); County Governments Act; Public Service Commission Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Michael Kojo Otieno & another v Homa Bay County Assembly [2021] KEELRC 1737 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Petition (Homa Bay; Constitutional Petition) - number not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1737/eng@2021-05-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.