Micah Gentunywa Ombongi v Laboratory and Allied Limited [2021] KEELRC 1690 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court ruled an employee's firing was unfair because the employer gave no valid reason and skipped the required hearing, awarding him over Kshs. 425,000.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Procedural and substantive fairness of termination
Termination was unfair for want of valid reason and fair procedure; the Claimant was not given a show-cause letter or a hearing
The Respondent's own witness admitted there was no letter to show cause and no hearing. The alleged reason, loss of trust and confidence, was not supported by any details or particulars. The Claimant's record was clean and he had recently been promoted, so he did not contribute to the decision to terminate. The Respondent failed to discharge its evidential burden under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act to justify termination.
Notice of termination
No clear evidence of a valid one-month notice; notice pay of one month's salary awarded
The Respondent alleged a notice dated 29 July 2016, but the Claimant denied receipt and disputed the signature acknowledging receipt. Even if served, the letter was indicated as received on 18 August 2016, which would not amount to one month's notice before termination on or about 30 August 2016. The Claimant was therefore allowed notice pay at Kshs. 60,798.
Quantum of compensation for unfair termination
Six months' gross salary awarded in lieu of the 12 months sought
In exercising discretion, the Court considered that the Claimant had worked only 2 years, was paid August salary and leave dues, and did not show how long he expected to continue working or whether he sought alternative employment. Mitigating factors included his recent promotion, clean record, and lack of contribution to the termination. Termination had both substantive and procedural imperfections, justifying 6 months' gross salary.
Service pay/gratuity and relocation allowance
Both prayers declined
The Claimant confirmed under cross-examination that he was subscribed to the N.S.S.F, which bars a claim for service pay. He did not exhibit any contract, wage order or other instrument entitling him to gratuity. On relocation, he had no receipts and no relocation policy was exhibited, leaving the prayer without factual or legal support. Both prayers were accordingly declined.
Legal principles established
#- An employer must satisfy the statutory threshold of fair termination under Sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, including valid reason and fair procedure
- The employer bears the evidential burden under Section 47(5) of the Employment Act to justify termination
- Loss of trust and confidence must be supported by assigned reasons; mere assertion without details does not constitute valid reason
Court orders
#- 1.Declaration that termination was unfair in both substance and procedure
- 2.Respondent to pay the Claimant equivalent of 6 months' gross salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 364,788
- 3.Respondent to pay notice pay equivalent of 1-month salary at Kshs. 60,798 (total Kshs. 425,586)
- 4.Costs to the Claimant
- 5.Interest allowed at court rates as prayed
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act; claim for unfair termination)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Micah Gentunywa Ombongi v Laboratory and Allied Limited [2021] KEELRC 1690 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause Number 2439 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1690/eng@2021-05-25
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.