Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedJudicial Review Notice of Motion dated 25th May 2021· [2021] KEELRC 1584 (KLR)

Republic v Registrar of Trade Unions, Ministry of Labor and Social Protection; Ex parte Kenya Union of Clinical Officers; Attorney General (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1584 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
17 June 2021
4,105 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court upheld the Registrar of Trade Unions' power to order union elections, rejecting a clinical officers' union bid to postpone polls to 2022.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Kenya Union of Clinical Officers, a trade union registered in July 2017 and run by interim officials who automatically became national office bearers under Article XX of its Constitution, sought judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus against the Registrar of Trade Unions. It challenged the Registrar's circular Ref No. ML&SP/TU/ELECTIONS/2021 dated 25th September 2020 ordering elections in all trade unions, contending that the directive violated Article 41(4)(a) and (b) of the Constitution, Section 34 of the Labour Relations Act, and its registered Constitution, which fixed its next elections for July 2022. The Registrar opposed, arguing that the union had never held elections, that its Constitution discriminated unfairly between incumbents and other candidates contrary to Section 34(2) of the Act and Article 27 of the Constitution, and that the directive fell squarely within her statutory mandate. Justice Maureen Onyango applied the Pastoli test of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety and Section 7(2) of the Fair Administrative Actions Act. She held that the Applicant failed to show the circular was illegal, unprocedural or unfair; that its Constitution's Articles XVIII and XX did not empower its Election Board to fix an election calendar, that power belonging to the Registrar under Section 34(3); and that Article XX must be read with Section 34(3) so that the interim officials' term ends upon the next elections called by the Registrar. The motion was dismissed with no orders for costs, but the Applicant was given until 30th August 2021 to conduct branch and national elections, with the Registrar to issue modified directions, and liberty to take administrative action to regularise the union's constitution, Article XX lapsing upon the elections.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Registrar's circular ordering elections in all trade unions violated Article 41(4) of the Constitution and Section 34 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

No violation was established; the Registrar acted within her statutory mandate under Section 34(2) and (5) of the Labour Relations Act.

Reasoning

The court reviewed Article 41(4) and Section 34 of the Labour Relations Act and found the Applicant failed to show the Registrar acted outside Section 34 or how the circular, issued generally to all trade unions, violated Article 41(4). Section 34(2) requires constitutions to bar unfair discrimination between incumbents and other candidates and to provide for elections at least every five years, and Section 34(5) empowers the Registrar to issue directions to that end. The Applicant also failed to address the Respondent's averment that its constitution contravened Section 34(2).

p. 6
02

Whether the Applicant's Constitution (Articles XVIII and XX) lawfully fixed its election cycle at July 2022

Holding

Article XX does not state the term of office of interim officials and Article XVIII does not empower the Elections Board to set an election calendar, which is the preserve of the Registrar.

Reasoning

The court examined Articles XVIII and XX of the Applicant's registered Constitution. Article XX, which converts interim officials into national office bearers for a 'first term', does not define that term or address branch officials never subjected to elections. Article XVIII establishes an Election Board but does not empower it to set a calendar of elections, a function the court held to be the Registrar's preserve under Section 34(3). Article XX must therefore be read with Section 34(3) such that the interim officials' term ends upon the next elections called by the Registrar.

p. 7
03

Whether the Applicant met the threshold for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus

Holding

The threshold was not met and the motion was dismissed.

Reasoning

Applying the Pastoli v Kabale District Local Government test (illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety) and Section 7(2) of the Fair Administrative Actions Act, the court found the Applicant had not demonstrated that the circular was illegal, unprocedural or unfair. The Respondent's directions were rationally connected to the statutory purpose of ensuring regular, non-discriminatory union elections, and the Applicant's evidence did not discharge the burden of showing an ultra vires act.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Judicial review relief is available only where the impugned administrative decision is tainted with illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety.
  • Trade union elections must be conducted in accordance with the union's registered constitution, but such a constitution may not discriminate unfairly between incumbents and other candidates and must provide for elections at least once every five years.
  • The Registrar of Trade Unions may lawfully issue directions to ensure union elections are conducted in accordance with Section 34 of the Labour Relations Act and the unions' respective constitutions.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 25th May 2021 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders for costs (each party to bear its own costs)
  3. 3.The Ex Parte Applicant is granted up to 30th August 2021 to carry out both its branch and national elections
  4. 4.The Respondent will issue modified directions to the Ex Parte Applicant to that effect
  5. 5.The Respondent is at liberty to take administrative action to ensure the Applicant's constitution meets the requirements of the Labour Relations Act including Section 34(2) thereof
  6. 6.Article XX of the Ex Parte Applicant's constitution will lapse upon the elections being held on or before 30th August 2021 and this fact should be reflected in its constitution

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSection 34(1), (2), (3), (4), (5)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41(4)(a) and (b), Article 27, Article 24(1), Article 159(2)(d), Article 48
  • Fair Administrative Actions ActSection 7(2)
  • Judicature ActSection 3
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 1B
  • ILO Convention 98 on Freedom of Association and of the Right to Organise

Cases cited (5)

  • Kenya National Union of Nurses v Registrar of Trade Unions & 8 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Noah Rotich & 6 Others v Union of Kenya Civil Servants & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Michael Ochieng Magugu v The Registrar of Trade Unions & 2 Others
    Petition Number 7 of 2016
  • Pastoli v Kabale District Local Government Canal & Others
    (2008) 2 EA 300
  • Aloise A. Otiende v Boniface Munyao
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction over administrative action under section 7(2) of the Fair Administrative Actions Act and sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act framework (orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Registrar of Trade Unions, Ministry of Labor and Social Protection; Ex parte Kenya Union of Clinical Officers; Attorney General (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1584 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Judicial Review Notice of Motion dated 25th May 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1584/eng@2021-06-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.