Republic v Attorney General & another;Kembi Gitura (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1547 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court refused to halt a Gazette Notice because the applicant should have asked for a stay when first filing the case.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Court can grant a stay of an impugned Gazette Notice by way of a subsequent motion where leave to commence judicial review was granted without stay
The application for stay was denied; stay should have been sought at the leave stage and the matter can be remedied by quashing orders at the conclusion of the judicial review
The Court noted that Nduma Nderi J. granted leave to commence proceedings on 19th March 2021 but did not order that the leave operate as stay. In judicial review practice, once leave is granted without an order that it operate as stay, the failure cannot be cured by a later interlocutory motion. Although Section 16 of the ELRC Act confers wide power to issue orders to meet the ends of justice, the Judge was not persuaded it was in the interests of justice to disturb the status quo, since quashing the Gazette Notice at the end of the case would right any wrong.
Legal principles established
#- In Judicial Review, failure to grant stay at the leave stage cannot be remedied by a subsequent motion
- Judicial Review is concerned with the process of decision-making, not its merits
Court orders
#- 1.Motion seeking stay of the impugned Gazette Notice made orally before the Court denied
- 2.No order as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 16 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Republic v Attorney General & another;Kembi Gitura (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1547 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1547/eng@2021-04-21
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.