Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNairobi ELRC Petition (number not stated in judgment)· [2021] KEELRC 1461 (KLR)

Consumer Federation of Kenya v Cabinet Secretary for Environment & Forestry & 3 others; Kenya School of Government & another (Interested Parties) (Petition E072 of 2020) [2021] KEELRC 1461 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
20 January 2021
3,250 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court allowed COFEK's challenge to NEMA's Director General appointment to proceed, rejecting NEMA's attempt to strike it out as repetitive litigation.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi, delivered by M. Mbaru J on 20 January 2021, determines a preliminary objection raised by the 3rd respondent, the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), seeking to strike out the petitioner's petition on grounds of res judicata and sub judice. The petition challenges the appointment of Mamo Boru Mamo as Director General of NEMA, alleging that the advertised qualifications contravened section 10 of EMCA, that no due diligence was conducted on his certificates, and that there was a violation of Article 35 of the Constitution relating to certificates allegedly belonging to a deceased person. NEMA relied on a multiplicity of earlier and pending suits - including ELRC Misc. 167 and 168 of 2019, ELRC JR 5 of 2020, Misc. 44 and 45 of 2020 and Court of Appeal Civil Application Nai. 17 of 2020 - arguing that the same public-interest litigants were re-litigating issues about NEMA appointments with cosmetic changes. The petitioner opposed, contending that a preliminary objection cannot rest on disputed facts and that the earlier suits concerned the appointment of an Acting Chief Procurement Officer, not the Director General, with different parties, facts and reliefs. The court applied the conjunctive elements of res judicata from Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act as explained in IEBC v Maina Kiai, and found that the causes of action and parties differed, and that the pending appeal arose from unrelated suits. The objection was dismissed with costs to abide the petition.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the petition is res judicata by reason of prior ELRC suits concerning NEMA appointments

Holding

The objection fails because the referenced suits concerned different causes of action and different parties - the appointment of an Acting Chief Procurement Officer, not the Director General's appointment

Reasoning

The court compared the referenced suits (JR 5 of 2020, Misc 168 of 2019, Misc 45 of 2020) with the instant petition. The earlier suits challenged the appointment of Mr Laban Gichohi and later Ms Evangeline Kinya Ratanya as Acting Chief Procurement Officer, whereas the petition challenges the appointment of Mamo Boru Mamo as Director General on grounds of qualifications under EMCA and alleged fraud. Although NEMA is a common respondent, the fundamental issue in dispute differs, so Section 7's conjunctive elements are not met.

p. 7
02

Whether the pending Court of Appeal matter renders the petition sub judice

Holding

The sub judice rule does not apply because the pending appeal arises from suits unrelated to the petition

Reasoning

The 3rd respondent relied on Nairobi Court of Appeal Civil Application Nai 17 of 2020 to argue sub judice. The court found that this appeal arose from other suits unrelated to the instant petition, and therefore the sub judice rule was not attracted. The petition could proceed notwithstanding the pending appeal and the pending JR 5 of 2020.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • For res judicata to be upheld, the elements of Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act must be satisfied conjunctively
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law on assumed facts

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Objections by the 3rd respondent are found without merit and dismissed
  2. 2.Costs shall abide the petition
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (not expressly cited); ruling on a preliminary objection under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Consumer Federation of Kenya v Cabinet Secretary for Environment & Forestry & 3 others; Kenya School of Government & another (Interested Parties) (Petition E072 of 2020) [2021] KEELRC 1461 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Nairobi ELRC Petition (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1461/eng@2021-01-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.