Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No. 1095 of 2016· [2021] KEELRC 1408 (KLR)

Kudheiha Workers v B.O.M. Eastleigh High School [2021] KEELRC 1408 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
11 February 2021
1,485 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to force a school to recognise a union because the union couldn't prove it had recruited most employees.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, a registered trade union, claimed that the respondent, a board of management empowered to run a public school, refused and/or neglected to sign a recognition agreement despite the union enrolling the school's non-teaching staff. The claimant sought an order compelling the respondent to sign the recognition agreement to enable collective bargaining. There was no defence on the record and the dispute was addressed by way of written submissions by consent. The respondent, citing authority, argued that recognition requires proof of a simple majority of unionisable employees under section 54(1) of the Labour Relations Act and that the claimant neither submitted evidence of such a majority nor forwarded its constitution to establish sectoral coverage. The court held that recognition of a trade union is regulated by section 54(1) of the LRA, that attainment of a simple majority is a matter of evidence, and that a union must also demonstrate it covers the employer's sector by forwarding its constitution. The claimant's check-off list of 19 persons was not contrasted against the total number of the respondent's unionisable employees, and the union failed to share its constitution with the respondent. The court found no basis to compel recognition, dismissed the suit, left the parties to return to the shop floor, allowed the claimant to move the court afresh once the simple majority threshold is achieved, and ordered each party to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant proved a simple majority under section 54(1) LRA

Holding

The claim failed; the claimant did not prove a simple majority of the respondent's unionisable employees

Reasoning

The claimant's check-off list of 16th July 2012 listed 19 persons, but there was no evidence contrasting that list against the total number of the respondent's non-teaching staff. Recognition cannot be granted on mere assertion of majority; it must be established on evidence as required by section 54(1) of the LRA and the authorities cited.

p. 2
02

Whether the claimant demonstrated sectoral coverage by forwarding its constitution

Holding

The claimant failed to share its union constitution with the respondent, which was necessary to establish the sector it is authorised to cover

Reasoning

A trade union seeking recognition must demonstrate it covers the industry and sector of the employer by forwarding its constitution at the time of seeking recognition. The court adopted the holding in Kenya Petroleum Oil Workers Union v Kenol Mahavir Service Station where failure to supply the constitution prevented the court from determining the sectors covered.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer must recognise a trade union for collective bargaining where that union represents a simple majority of unionisable employees and operates in the employer's sector
  • Attainment of a simple majority for recognition is a matter of evidence and a trade union must lay documentary evidence before the court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The instant suit is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party shall bear own costs
  3. 3.The claimant is at liberty to move the court under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act, 2007 where the simple majority threshold is achieved
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over the dispute concerning refusal to sign a recognition agreement, pursuant to section 54 of the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kudheiha Workers v B.O.M. Eastleigh High School [2021] KEELRC 1408 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause No. 1095 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1408/eng@2021-02-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.