Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 22nd March 2021)· [2021] KEELRC 1372 (KLR)

Republic v Attorney General & another Ex Parte Benedict Kabugi Ndungu; Kembi Gitura (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1372 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
29 June 2021
3,064 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court upheld President-appointed CA Chair Kembi Gitura, ruling that a suspended court decision kept the 2018 amendments valid during the interim period.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ex Parte Applicant, Benedict Kabugi Ndungu, sought an order of certiorari to quash Gazette Notice No. 2215 of 2021 appointing Hon. Kembi Gitura (Interested Party) as Chairperson of the Board of the Communications Authority of Kenya, contending the appointment was procedurally flawed, ultra vires, and made without a gazette vacancy notice or selection panel as required by Sections 6 and 6B of the Kenya Information and Communications Act as amended in 2013, and contrary to Articles 10, 27, 41, 47(1) and 232 of the Constitution. The Applicant relied on the Okiya Omtatah judgment of 30th January 2020 declaring the 2018 amendments to Section 6 unconstitutional, null and void. The 1st Respondent (Attorney General) opposed, arguing that the Senate of the Republic of Kenya decision of 29th October 2020 suspended the nullification of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendment) Act No. 18 of 2018 for nine months, during which the amended Section 6 remained operative; that provision vests appointment discretion solely in the President and requires no competitive process. The court agreed, holding that the suspended declaration meant the 2018 amendments continued to apply in the interim period, and that the President lawfully exercised his discretion. The judicial review application was dismissed in its entirety with no order as to costs, each party bearing their own costs in view of the public interest nature of the matter.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of the suspended declaration of invalidity of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendment) Act No. 18 of 2018 on the applicable appointment procedure

Holding

Because the Senate of the Republic of Kenya judgment suspended the nullification of the 2018 amendments for nine months, the 2018 amendments (including the amended Section 6 of the KIC Act) remained in force, and the appointment did not require a gazette vacancy notice or selection panel

Reasoning

The Omtatah judgment had declared the 2018 amendments to Section 6 of the KIC Act unconstitutional. However, the subsequent Senate of the Republic of Kenya decision suspended the orders nullifying the impugned Acts for nine months from 29th October 2020, within which Parliament could regularise them. During that interim period the amended law retained force. The appointment was gazetted on 10th March 2021, before expiry of the suspension, and therefore rested on the validly applicable Section 6 as amended in 2018, which vests appointment discretion in the President.

p. 3
02

Whether the appointment was ultra vires and procedurally flawed for want of a vacancy notice and selection panel

Holding

The appointment was lawful because the provision relied on (Section 6 as amended by the 2018 Act) does not require a vacancy declaration or selection panel and vests the power to appoint in the President

Reasoning

The Applicant argued the appointment contravened Sections 6 and 6B of the KIC Act as amended in 2013, requiring a gazette vacancy notice and a selection panel. The court found the operative law was the 2018 version, which solely vests the appointment power in the President. Consequently, the alleged procedural omissions did not render the appointment unlawful, and no basis existed to quash the Gazette Notice.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a declaration of invalidity of a statute is suspended for a fixed period, the impugned statute continues to apply during the interim period pending expiry of the suspension
  • In public interest matters, a court may order each party to bear its own costs

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judicial review application dismissed in its entirety
  2. 2.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Kenya Information and Communications ActSections 6, 6B (as amended 2013 and by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendment) Act No. 18 of 2018)
  • Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) ActNo. 18 of 2018
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 10, 27, 41, 47(1), 110(3), 129, 232
  • Employment Act(referred to generally in 1st Respondent's submissions)

Cases cited (9)

  • Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 4 Others v Attorney General & 4 Others; Council of Governors & 4 others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
  • Senate of the Republic of Kenya & 4 Others v Speaker of the National Assembly & Another; Attorney General & 7 Others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR, High Court Petition 284 & 353 of 2019
  • Re Speaker, County Assembly of Embu
    [2018] eKLR
  • Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 3 Others Ex-Parte Olive Telecommunication PVT Limited
    [2014] eKLR
  • Wambua Maithya v Pharmacy and Poisons Board; Pharmaceutical Society of Kenya & 2 Others (Interested Parties)
    [2019] eKLR
  • Githu Muigai & Another v Law Society of Kenya & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Resley v The City Council of Nairobi
    [2006] 2 EA 311
  • Jasbir Singh Rai & 3 Others v Tarlochan Singh Rai & 4 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Law Society of Kenya v Kenya Revenue Authority & Another
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction under order of certiorari, following leave granted by the Court on 19th March 2021; Constitution of Kenya 2010 (Articles 10, 27, 41, 47(1), 129, 232)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Attorney General & another Ex Parte Benedict Kabugi Ndungu; Kembi Gitura (Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 1372 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 22nd March 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1372/eng@2021-06-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.