Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedCivil Miscellaneous Application (filed 20th April 2021, refiled 9th February 2021; originally filed as Civil Miscellaneous Number 109 of 2020)· [2021] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)

June Jebet v Director General Kenya School of Government & Director Baringo Campus [2021] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
27 July 2021
1,657 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court excused the Attorney General's late appeal filing, blaming COVID-19 court closures, and gave 14 days to appeal a Kshs 594,565 award.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Hellen Wasilwa, J) determines the Attorney General's application under Sections 79G and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 50 of the Constitution seeking enlargement of time to file an appeal out of time against a judgment of Hon. Limo awarding June Jebet Kshs. 594,565.40. The Applicant explained the delay by reference to COVID-19 court closures, an initial filing on 28th July 2020 that was assigned Civil Miscellaneous Number 109 of 2020 but never placed before the court, and a subsequent misfiling in the High Court instead of the ELRC, which was regularized. The Respondent opposed, contending the annexures offended Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declaration Rules, that the application offended lis pendens and sub-judice given a pending judicial review seeking mandamus to compel payment, and that the delay was inordinate given the online filing system in place. The court did not rule on the objections in detail, finding instead that the Applicant had an expectation of exhausting the appeal process and that the failure to file in time was due to COVID-related court closures. The application was allowed: time was enlarged with the appeal to be filed within 14 days, stay orders were granted pending filing and hearing of the appeal, and costs were made costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Defective annexures under Rule 9 of the Oaths and Statutory Declaration Rules

Holding

Rejected; the application was nonetheless allowed despite the complaint

Reasoning

The Respondent relied on Kenya National Union of Nurses –v- Kiambu County Public Service to argue that unsealed, unmarked annexures render the affidavit improper and liable to be expunged, warranting dismissal of the motion. The court, however, did not expunge the affidavit and proceeded to determine the application on the merits.

p. 2
02

Lis pendens / sub-judice and loss of right to appeal

Holding

Rejected; the pending judicial review did not bar the application

Reasoning

The Respondent argued that the pending Judicial Review Application number 1 of 2021 seeking mandamus, and section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act, rendered the application sub-judice, and that filing the judicial review extinguished the Applicant's right of appeal. The court did not uphold these objections and allowed the application.

p. 3
03

Whether the delay in filing the appeal out of time was excusable

Holding

Delay excused; time enlarged

Reasoning

The court found the Applicant had an expectation of pursuing an appeal and that the failure to file in time was attributable to COVID-related closure of courts. The initial filing on 28th July 2020 in the wrong forum was treated as a timeous approach, regularized once the anomaly was noted. The inordinate-delay objection was rejected.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Enlargement of time to file an appeal is a matter of the court's discretion

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is allowed
  2. 2.Stay orders granted pending filing and hearing of the appeal
  3. 3.Time enlarged; the appeal to be filed within 14 days
  4. 4.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 79G
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 95
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 50
  • Oaths and Statutory Declaration RulesRule 9

Cases cited (3)

  • Paul Musili Wambua –v- Attorney General & 2 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Kenya National Union of Nurses –v- Kiambu County Public Service & 5 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Grace Chemutai Koech –v- Franices Kiplangat Chebiror & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court (trial court, Hon. Limo)
ELRC Cause number 109 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 79G and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 50 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "June Jebet v Director General Kenya School of Government & Director Baringo Campus [2021] KEELRC 1174 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Civil Miscellaneous Application (filed 20th April 2021, refiled 9th February 2021; originally filed as Civil Miscellaneous Number 109 of 2020). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1174/eng@2021-07-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.