Galgalo Jarso Jillo v National Bank of Kenya Limited [2021] KEELRC 1170 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court confirmed it cannot extend the three-year deadline for contract-based unfair termination claims, no matter how sympathetic the delay.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the ELRC can extend the limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act for claims arising from a contract of service
The Court has no power to extend time under Section 90; the limitation period is mandatory and cannot be extended in contract-based claims
Section 90 of the Employment Act ousts the general extension power under Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act and requires contract-based employment claims to be filed within three years. The Court of Appeal in Beatrice Kahai Adagala v Postal Corporation of Kenya held the provision mandatory and that extension is only possible in tort claims under Sections 27 and 28 of the Limitation of Actions Act. Bound by stare decisis, the judge declined the motion despite sympathy for the applicant's circumstances.
Legal principles established
#- A claim based on a contract of employment must be filed within three years under Section 90 of the Employment Act, which is in mandatory terms and admits of no extension
Court orders
#- 1.The Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 16th February 2021 is declined
- 2.Each party to bear their own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 90 of the Employment Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Galgalo Jarso Jillo v National Bank of Kenya Limited [2021] KEELRC 1170 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 16th February 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1170/eng@2021-07-29
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.