Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCA No. E022 of 2020 (Objection Application dated 25th January 2021)· [2021] KEELRC 1096 (KLR)

Kenya County Government Workers Union v Embu Water and Sewerage Company Limited; Kenya Union of Water and Sewerage Employees (Objector) [2021] KEELRC 1096 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 August 2021
2,798 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court refused to register a water company's CBA because the employer negotiated with the wrong union without SRC approval.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
KUWASE objected to the registration of CBA No. E022 of 2020 (1st July 2019 to 30th June 2021) between KCGWU and Embu Water and Sewerage Company Limited, arguing it held a valid, subsisting recognition agreement with the Employer never cancelled by the National Labour Board, and that court decisions had established KUWASE as the proper union for the water sector. The SRC also objected that its advice had not been sought, water company employees being public officers. KCGWU opposed, arguing the employer named in the application did not exist, the objection raised flimsy grounds, the application was served late, and allegations of collusion were unproved. The court, Maureen Onyango J, framed a single issue: whether the CBA should be registered. It found the KUWASE recognition agreement had never been terminated, that the Employer's recognition agreement with KCGWU was signed during its subsistence, and that an employer with a subsisting recognition agreement lacks capacity to contract with another union over the same employees. Consistent with Court of Appeal authority, KUWASE is the appropriate union for water companies. Independently, the CBA would still have failed registration because the Employer did not obtain SRC approval before forwarding it, SRC advice being binding. The court declined to register the CBA. No costs order was made. The judgment contains several minor naming inconsistencies (EWASCO/WASCO designations, KUWASE/NUWASE and KCGWU/KCKWU references).

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether KCGWU and the Employer had capacity to negotiate the CBA

Holding

They had no capacity because the recognition agreement between KUWASE (NUWASE) and the Employer was never terminated, and superior court decisions establish KUWASE as the appropriate union for the water sector

Reasoning

The National Labour Board never sanctioned revocation of the KUWASE recognition agreement, and the Employer's own recognition agreement with KCGWU was signed on 7th June 2017 during the subsistence of the KUWASE agreement. The Court of Appeal and this Court had previously held KUWASE the appropriate union for water companies. Accordingly, KCGWU and the Employer lacked capacity to enter a recognition agreement or negotiate a CBA.

p. 4
02

Whether absence of SRC approval independently barred registration

Holding

Yes - the Employer did not obtain SRC approval before forwarding the CBA for registration, so the CBA would not have been registered on that ground alone

Reasoning

Section 15(6) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act requires the Court to refer to SRC guidelines to the extent relevant. Relying on the TSC v KNUT decision on the binding nature of SRC advice under Article 230(4)(b), the court held the Employer was obliged to seek SRC advice before CBA negotiations, which it did not do.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer with a valid and subsisting recognition agreement lacks capacity to enter into another recognition agreement with a different union over the same employees
  • An employer is required to seek SRC advice before entering into CBA negotiations with a union

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The court declined to register CBA No. E022 of 2020 between KCGWU and Embu Water and Sewerage Company Limited
Jurisdiction invoked
Labour Relations Act and Employment and Labour Relations Act - registration of collective agreements under section 60(6) and (7) of the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya County Government Workers Union v Embu Water and Sewerage Company Limited; Kenya Union of Water and Sewerage Employees (Objector) [2021] KEELRC 1096 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). CA No. E022 of 2020 (Objection Application dated 25th January 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/1096/eng@2021-08-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.