Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 86 of 2019· [2021] KEELRC 866 (KLR)

Lawrence Paul Munyi & 2 others v Attorney General [2021] KEELRC 866 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 September 2021
2,845 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court awarded over 500 meteorological assistants Kshs.270,000 each after a 20-year delay in upgrading their jobs and paying their salaries.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimants, over 500 pensionable Meteorological Assistants appointed by the Public Service Commission, sued on 11.7.2003 for failure to implement Personnel General Letter No. 15 of 9.1.1995 harmonising entry grades for Certificate and Diploma holders in the Civil Service. On 10.5.2004 Justice P. Kihara Kariuki granted declaratory and upgrading reliefs (prayers a, b, c and f), leaving for formal proof damages for breach of contract and for breach of the right to protection from discrimination. The suit was transferred to the ELRC in 2019 and the two outstanding issues were disposed of by written submissions. The court held that damages for breach of an employment contract equal the total financial loss suffered, subject to mitigation. Since the employer had paid the salary arrears of Kshs.116,453,524 in 2015, no further damages for breach were payable except the cost of waiting, equated with interest on the arrears; the claimants' authorities seeking 12 months' gross salary were distinguished, and each claimant was awarded a flat Kshs.70,000. On discrimination, the court found that some officers in the cadre had been upgraded while the claimants were not, contrary to section 82 of the retired Constitution and Article 27 of the current Constitution, describing the 20-year delay as grave, unjustified, callous and inhuman, and awarded Kshs.200,000 general damages to each affected claimant. Costs with interest were awarded to the claimants, the respondent having filed no defence and caused 17 years of delay. The awards were stated to be in addition to the 2004 partial judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Measure of damages for breach of contract

Holding

Since salary arrears were paid in full in 2015, no further damages for breach were payable beyond the cost of waiting, awarded as a flat Kshs.70,000 per claimant

Reasoning

The financial loss from the breach was the withheld salary increments, which the employer paid in 2015 following the partial judgment. The precedents cited by the claimants for 12 months' gross salary were distinguishable. The only remaining head was the cost of waiting for payment, equated with interest on the arrears; given over 500 claimants and arrears spanning years, a flat figure of Kshs.70,000 per claimant was reasonable and time-saving.

p. 4
02

Violation of the right to protection from discrimination

Holding

The failure to upgrade the claimants as directed, while some colleagues were upgraded, violated section 82 of the retired Constitution and Article 27 of the current Constitution

Reasoning

The claimants established they were treated differently from other officers in their cadre. A letter dated 5.9.2014 from the Permanent Secretary listed officers who had already been upgraded, confirming differential treatment. The 20-year delay despite advice from the DPM and PSC was described as grave, unjustified, callous and inhuman. General damages of Kshs.200,000 per affected claimant were awarded, balancing the parties' interests and the numbers involved.

p. 4
03

Costs of the suit

Holding

Costs awarded to the claimants because no defence was filed and the respondent caused proceedings to drag for 17 years

Reasoning

The respondent denied liability by letter, never filed a defence even after leave was granted, and caused the proceedings to drag for 17 years. Fairness dictated that the claimants be awarded costs with interest at court rates from the date of judgment.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Damages for breach of an employment contract equal the total financial loss suffered, subject to the duty to mitigate
  • The cost of waiting for payment is interest on the principal sum
  • Failure to upgrade some officers as directed while others were upgraded constitutes unlawful discrimination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Each claimant is awarded Kshs.70,000 as interest on the salary arrears paid to them after the delay in upgrading their positions
  2. 2.Each Claimant who was affected by the Respondent's violations of their right to protection from discrimination is awarded Kshs.200,000 as general damages for violation
  3. 3.The Claimants are awarded costs plus interest at Court rates from the date of the judgment
  4. 4.The awards are in addition to the orders and reliefs granted by Hon Justice P. Kihara Kariuki in his partial Judgment of 10.5.2004

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya (retired)Section 82
  • Constitution of Kenya (2010)Article 27
  • ELRC Procedure RulesRule 28(3)

Cases cited (5)

  • Communications Commissions of Kenya & 5 Others v Royal Media Services Limited & 5 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • CPC Industrial Products v Angima
    [LLR No. 3472 (CAK)]
  • Chain Overseas Engineering Company Limited v Isaaq Kichweu Kijo
    [2019] eKLR
  • Standard Group Limited v Jenny Lusesby
    [2018] eKLR
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v Republic
Jurisdiction invoked
Transferred to the ELRC by the High Court under the new constitutional dispensation (order dated 8.2.2019); original employment dispute jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lawrence Paul Munyi & 2 others v Attorney General [2021] KEELRC 866 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause No 86 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/866/eng@2021-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.