Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 14 of 2019· [2021] KEELRC 830 (KLR)

Hillary Chongwony v County Government of Bungoma [2021] KEELRC 830 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
7 October 2021
644 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A former Bungoma Deputy Governor's Kshs 5.4 million housing claim could not be decided without trial because evidence like leases and receipts must be tested in court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a former Deputy Governor of Bungoma County (2013–2017), sued the County Government alleging breach of contract for unpaid housing benefit. The County Government's Defence pleaded that it had housed him at Webuye Guest House at its expense. The Claimant moved to strike out the Defence for disclosing no reasonable defence, being actuated by malice to delay trial, and constituting an abuse of process, and further sought judgment of Kshs 5,400,000/- with costs and interest. He relied on Gazette Notice No. 6518 of 2017 and the High Court decision in Council of Governors v Salaries and Remuneration Commission (Petition No. 328 of 2016), contending Deputy Governors were entitled to housing benefit. The County Government opposed, arguing the Court's Rules made no provision for summary procedures and that the Gazette Notice and judgment were not retrospective. The Court declined to strike out the Defence, holding that whether the County Government had facilitated the Claimant's housing at Webuye Guest House required the production and proof of facts such as leases and payment receipts, and was therefore a triable issue to be resolved at trial. Judgment was not entered. Pre-trial directions were given for witness statements, documents and Agreed Issues, with the Claimant's Proposed Issues to be adopted in default of agreement, and the Cause was transferred to Bungoma with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Memorandum of Defence should be struck out for disclosing no reasonable defence

Holding

The application failed because the Defence raised a triable issue as to whether the County Government had housed the Claimant at Webuye Guest House

Reasoning

The County Government had pleaded in its Defence that it facilitated the Claimant's housing at Webuye Guest House. The Claimant argued no evidence of such facilitation was exhibited. The Court held that proving or disproving such facilitation would require the production and proof of facts such as leases and payment receipts, which can only be resolved at trial, not on a striking-out application. The Court therefore declined to strike out the Defence and gave pre-trial directions instead.

p. 2
02

Whether summary judgment could be entered for the Claimant

Holding

Judgment was not entered; the matter was directed to trial with pre-trial timelines

Reasoning

The Claimant sought judgment of Kshs 5,400,000/- with costs and interest. The Court found a triable issue existed and that the Cause had not yet gone through pre-trial, and accordingly gave directions for filing of witness statements and documents, and Agreed Issues, before trial, transferring the file to Bungoma.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A defence which requires the production and proof of facts, such as leases and payment receipts, raises a triable issue and should not be struck out

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Cause to proceed to trial as the Defence raises a triable issue
  2. 2.The Respondent to file and serve witness statements and documents on or before 29 October 2021
  3. 3.The parties to file Agreed Issues on or before 30 November 2021
  4. 4.In default of agreement, the Claimant's Proposed Issues to be adopted as the trial Issues
  5. 5.The Cause transferred to the Court in Bungoma (the Deputy Registrar to transmit the file forthwith)
  6. 6.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Gazette Notice No. 6518 of 2017prescription that a Deputy Governor was entitled to be housed by the County Government
  • Rules of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (referred to as 'the Rules of this Court')whether they provide for summary procedures

Cases cited (1)

  • Council of Governors v Salaries and Remuneration Commission
    Petition No. 328 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over a claim by a former Deputy Governor for breach of contract (unpaid housing benefit); originating cause filed 19 December 2019

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hillary Chongwony v County Government of Bungoma [2021] KEELRC 830 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause No 14 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/830/eng@2021-10-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.