Francis Kibugi Wanjohi v Kenya Railways Corporation [2021] KEELRC 793 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a suit filed in a court without jurisdiction can be transferred to the court with jurisdiction
The application was allowed and the file transferred to the ELRC, following the line of authority that transfer of an existing claim is an administrative facilitative act consistent with Article 159 and the overriding objective, since the mistake was made in good faith and both parties conceded the Chief Magistrate's Court lacked jurisdiction
The court reviewed the conflicting authorities: Equity Bank v Mutie and Phoenix of E.A. Assurance (nullity not transferable) versus KPAWU v Cargill, Ali Jarso Wako, Henry Kigen and Prisca Jepngétich. It found courts must consider good faith in filing in the wrong forum. The mistake was inadvertent, the claimant had an employment dispute undetermined on merit, and requiring fresh filings would waste fees, time and possibly defeat limitation under Section 90 of the Employment Act, contrary to Article 159(2)(d) and Sections 3 and 12(3)(viii) of the ELRC Act.
Legal principles established
#- Where a suit is filed in a court lacking jurisdiction in good faith (through counsel's inadvertent mistake), the court should administer substantive justice under Article 159(2)(d) and transfer the file to the correct forum rather than compel fresh filing
Court orders
#- 1.The Chief Magistrates Court matter, Milimani MCELRC/E993/2020 is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi for hearing and determination
- 2.Parties shall move the Employment and Labour Relations Court for pre-trial conferencing, upon the arrival of the file from the Chief Magistrates Court
- 3.The Respondent is awarded costs of this application
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution; Section 3 and Section 12(3)(viii) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (4)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Kimatu v East Meat Supplies Limited (Miscellaneous Application E004 of 2024) [2024] KEELRC 2531 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 2531 (KLR)17 Oct 2024applied
- Wachiuri v Kaisugu Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E010 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 1949 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 1949 (KLR)23 Jul 2024followed
- Juma v Peter Wachira t/a Club Xcape Nakuru & another (Miscellaneous Application E045 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3312 (KLR)[2023] KEELRC 3312 (KLR)20 Dec 2023
- Harun Kiptarus Tanui v East African Portland Cement Plc [2022] KEELRC 212 (KLR)[2022] KEELRC 212 (KLR)18 Mar 2022applied
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Francis Kibugi Wanjohi v Kenya Railways Corporation [2021] KEELRC 793 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Misc Application No E072 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/793/eng@2021-10-08
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.