Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedPetition No 14 of 2019· [2021] KEELRC 783 (KLR)

Rose Esther Muthoni Wamuiya & 2 others v Governor, Nyandarua County Government & 3 others [2021] KEELRC 783 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
12 October 2021
4,908 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a Governor cannot fire County Executive Committee members without reasons and a fair hearing, awarding each fired CEC over KShs. 8 million.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Three former County Executive Committee members of Nyandarua County petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court after the Governor terminated their employment through a press release in August 2019 without reasons or a hearing. They sought declarations that the termination was unconstitutional, unfair and illegal, contravening the Employment Act, the County Government Act, the Fair Administrative Action Act and Articles 27, 41, 43, 47, 50 and 236 of the Constitution, together with Kshs. 70 million general damages and Kshs. 16 million loss of income. The 1st and 2nd respondents defended the dismissal under Section 31(a) of the County Government Act and the pleasure doctrine, arguing the petitioners were State Officers not covered by the Employment Act. The 3rd and 4th respondents disavowed any role in the termination. The court held that the Employment Act does not apply to State Officers but that the Governor could not dismiss CEC members at will: Section 31(a) requires valid, appropriate or necessary reasons and due process. Relying on the Court of Appeal's decisions in Richard Bwogo Birir and Idriss Aden Mukhtar, the court found the pleasure doctrine had not been preserved, that the petitioners were condemned unheard, and that Articles 41, 47, 50 and 236 were breached. The petition was allowed: each petitioner received 12 months' salary compensation and Kshs. 5 million general damages, totaling Kshs. 8,428,844 less statutory deductions, with costs and interest from the 1st and 2nd respondents. Judgment was delivered virtually on 12th October 2021 by Hellen Wasilwa, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Employment Act 2007 applies to County Executive Committee members

Holding

The Employment Act does not apply to State Officers; the petitioners' terms are regulated by the Constitution and relevant statutes, principles of fair administrative action and rules of natural justice

Reasoning

The court adopted the Court of Appeal's decision in County Government of Nyeri v Cecilia Wangechi Ndungu holding that CEC members, being State Officers under Article 260, fall outside the Employment Act. However, this did not defeat the petition because dismissal was still subject to constitutional fair process requirements and the Fair Administrative Action Act.

p. 5
02

Whether the petitioners were accorded fair administrative action before termination

Holding

No - the Governor was required to assign valid reasons and follow due procedure before terminating the petitioners, and did not do so

Reasoning

Although Section 31(a) of the County Government Act permits the Governor to dismiss a CEC member he considers it appropriate or necessary, the words 'consider', 'appropriate' and 'necessary' import a requirement of valid, compelling reasons and an opportunity to be heard. The Court of Appeal in Idriss Aden Mukhtar held the pleasure doctrine was not preserved under Section 31(a). The 3rd and 4th respondents were not even notified of the termination process.

p. 6
03

Whether the petitioners' constitutional rights were breached

Holding

Yes - Articles 47, 50, 41 and 236 of the Constitution were breached

Reasoning

The petitioners were condemned unheard; the Fair Administrative Action Act was not adhered to, flouting Article 47. No fair process under Article 50 was followed. As public officers they could not be dismissed without due process of law under Article 236, and their rights under Article 41 were breached.

p. 7
04

Whether the petitioners are entitled to the remedies sought

Holding

Partially - each petitioner awarded 12 months' salary compensation plus Kshs. 5,000,000 general damages for constitutional violation

Reasoning

The court found the petitioners' careers were cut short when they had a reasonable expectation to serve for five years. Guided by Section 49 of the Employment Act as endorsed in Idriss Aden Mukhtar, it awarded 12 months' salary for unfair termination and Kshs. 5,000,000 each for the constitutional violation, less statutory deductions, with costs and interest.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The pleasure doctrine was not preserved under Section 31(a) of the County Governments Act; a Governor may dismiss a CEC member under that section only for valid and appropriate reasons and subject to due process
  • A public officer cannot be dismissed or removed from office without due process of law under Article 236 of the Constitution

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Each petitioner is awarded compensation equivalent to 12 months' salary (Kshs. 3,428,844) for the unfair and unlawful termination
  2. 2.The 1st and 2nd respondents to pay each petitioner general damages of Kshs. 5,000,000 for breach and violation of their constitutional rights
  3. 3.Each petitioner entitled to gross payment of Kshs. 8,428,844 less statutory deductions
  4. 4.The 1st and 2nd respondents to pay costs of the suit plus interest at court rates from the date of judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 41, 47, 50, 179, 236, 260
  • Employment Act, 2007Sections 3, 40, 41, 45, 46, 49(1)
  • County Government Act, 2012Sections 31(a), 40, 41
  • Fair Administrative Action ActSection 4

Cases cited (8)

  • Narok County Government & Another -v- Richard Bwogo Birir and another
    [2015] eKLR
  • County Government of Garissa and another -v- Idriss Aden Mukhtar & 2 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • County Government of Nyeri and Another -v- Cecilia Wangechi Ndungu
    [2015] eKLR
  • Fredrick Karisa Shungu & 3 others -v- Geoffrey Gidyo Dida
    [2012] eKLR
  • Kalpana H. Rawal -v- Judicial Service Commission & 3 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Hassan Ali Joho & Another vs Suleiman Said Shabbal
    Pet 10 of 2013
  • David Dunsmuir -vs- New Brunswick
    (2008) 1 S.C.R 190
  • Hill VS William Hill (Park Lane) Ltd
    (1949) AC 530
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over employment disputes of County Executive Committee members (matter filed in the Employment & Labour Relations Court); constitutional petition under Articles 41, 47, 50 and 236 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Rose Esther Muthoni Wamuiya & 2 others v Governor, Nyandarua County Government & 3 others [2021] KEELRC 783 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Petition No 14 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/783/eng@2021-10-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.