Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherNot stated in judgment

Grace Otieno v Salaries and Remuneration Commisison [2021] KEELRC 691 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 October 2021
929 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court ruled that once you appeal a judgment, you lose the right to ask the same court to review it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, who had obtained judgment on 17th February, 2017 awarding notice pay, leave days, compensation and costs but no interest, filed an application dated 2nd August, 2021 seeking review of that judgment to include interest accrued on the award. The respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 10th September, 2021 contending that the claimant's right of review was extinguished upon filing a Notice of Appeal and the subsequent hearing and dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 418 of 2017, in which ground 5 had challenged the denial of interest on the damages awarded. The respondent argued the court was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction, and that the application invited the court to review the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The claimant maintained she was entitled to interest as a successful litigant who had waited years for payment. The court, M. Mbaru J, held that the right of review under section 16 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2011 and Rule 33 of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 is lost once an appeal is filed; relying on William Karani & 47 others v Wamalwa Kijana and African Airlines International Limited v Eastern & Southern Africa Trade Bank Limited, all complaints ought to have been raised in the appeal. Having rendered itself with finality after the appeal, the court stood functus officio. The preliminary objection was allowed with each party bearing their own costs.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the claimant's right to review the judgment delivered on 17th February, 2017 was extinguished upon filing of a Notice of Appeal and the hearing and disposal of Civil Appeal No. 418 of 2017
  2. 2.Whether the court became functus officio upon filing of the appeal and thus lacks jurisdiction to hear the application for review
  3. 3.Whether the application for review is incompetent and incurably defective as the order sought to be reviewed was already the subject of an appeal

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court has jurisdiction to review its own judgment after the aggrieved party filed and pursued an appeal to the Court of Appeal

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction; upon filing the appeal the right of review was lost and the court became functus officio. The preliminary objection is allowed.

Reasoning

Rule 33(1) of the ELRC (Procedure) Rules, 2016 permits review only by a person aggrieved by a decree or order from which no appeal is preferred or allowed. The claimant filed an appeal (Civil Appeal No. 418 of 2017) which was heard and dismissed. Citing William Karani and African Airlines International, the court held that once an appeal is taken, review is ousted and the matter merges in the appeal. Filing a review after the appeal would be an abuse of court process.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Once an appeal is taken against a judgment, the right of review is ousted and the court becomes functus officio; all complaints must be raised in the appeal
  • A review application must be filed before the appeal is lodged; once the appeal is heard, the review cannot be proceeded with

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent's Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 10th September, 2021 is found with merit and is allowed
  2. 2.Each party shall pay their own costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Civil Appeal No. 418 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 16 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2011 and Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016

Relief refused

#

Review of the judgment delivered on 17th February, 2017 and award of interest on the damages awarded

Upon filing an appeal against the decree, order or judgment of the court, the right of review is lost; the court is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to entertain the review after the appeal was heard and determined

p. 2

Costs

Each party shall pay own costs

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Upon filing an appeal against the decree, order or judgement of the court, the right of review is lost.
p. 2Loss of right of review upon filing an appeal
Once an appeal is taken, review is ousted and the matter to be remedied by review must merge in the appeal.
p. 2Merger of review in appeal - William Karani principle
The claimant has since filed an appeal under which all complaints ought to have been addressed as to file the instant application seeking a review of the judgement herein after the appeal, this court has rendered itself with finality. It stand functus officio.
p. 2Functus officio after appeal
Accordingly, objections by the respondent vide notice dated 10th September, 2021 are found with merit and hereby allowed. Each party shall pay own costs.
p. 2Final orders - preliminary objection allowed

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Judgment does not state the case title, case number or neutral citation of the matter before the court

minor

The two cases relied on by the claimant on entitlement to interest (Michael Murimi Kamanzi and Jasper Juma Nzuki) are cited but not addressed in the determination

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Grace Otieno v Salaries and Remuneration Commisison [2021] KEELRC 691 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/691/eng@2021-10-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.