Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Statement of Claim dated 15th February 2021)· [2021] KEELRC 652 (KLR)

Harrison Macharia Maina v Leo Design Limited [2021] KEELRC 652 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
29 September 2021
2,102 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that forcing an employee onto indefinite unpaid leave is constructive dismissal, awarding him over Kshs 1.2 million.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a Technician previously employed at a gross monthly salary of Kshs. 93,818/-, sued the Respondent alleging constructive dismissal. He contended that on 20th June 2020 the Respondent placed him on indefinite unpaid leave, forcing him to resign on 29th October 2020 in order to access terminal benefits. He sought declarations of unfair constructive dismissal, terminal dues, twelve months' compensation, refund of LEMOC Welfare Group contributions, public holiday and off-day allowances, unpaid leave, notice pay, a certificate of service, and rights over motor vehicle KCC 470L based on legitimate expectation and an alleged tacit agreement that it would be sold to him at a nominal price. The Respondent did not appear at the hearing and the court determined the claim on the Claimant's uncontroverted evidence and submissions, which relied on authorities on constructive dismissal and legitimate expectation. The court held that the Claimant's forced resignation fit the mould of constructive dismissal and that he was entitled to recompense. It applied a 12-month limitation to dues claims, restricting public holiday dues to 2020 (where none fell due) and awarding leave pay only for 2020, as the Respondent's accountant's statement indicated he had taken leave. The claim to retain or have the vehicle transferred was refused; the Claimant was ordered to return KCC 470L within 14 days but was awarded Kshs. 150,000/- for repairs and servicing. The court awarded notice pay, leave pay, six months' compensation, and calculated but unpaid terminal benefits, with costs and interest.

Key legal issues

#
01

Constructive dismissal

Holding

Forcing an employee onto indefinite unpaid leave creates an intolerable environment amounting to constructive dismissal

Reasoning

The court accepted the Claimant's unchallenged evidence that he was placed on indefinite unpaid leave from 22 June 2020 and subsequently forced to resign to obtain terminal benefits. Relying on the principles cited by the Claimant from Roshankar and Sitati, the court found the resignation was not voluntary and fit within the mould of constructive dismissal, entitling him to recompense.

p. 3
02

Limitation on employment dues

Holding

Public holiday dues recoverable only for 2020, within 12 months of filing

Reasoning

The court applied the 12-month limitation to claims for public holiday allowances, excluding 2017, 2018 and 2019 claims. It also found that for 2020 the Claimant was on unpaid leave, and the schedule showed no days falling on public holidays, so nil was awarded under this head.

p. 3
03

Burden of proof on leave

Holding

Claimant failed to prove he was denied leave; only leave pay for 2020 awarded

Reasoning

Despite the Respondent's absence, the court examined the record including the Respondent's accountant's statement, which indicated the Claimant had gone on leave. The court therefore did not accept the uncontroverted assertion of untaken leave and limited the award to leave pay for 2020, the year he was on unpaid leave.

p. 3
04

Legitimate expectation over motor vehicle

Holding

Rejected; Claimant to return the vehicle but awarded Kshs. 150,000/- for repairs and servicing

Reasoning

The Claimant asserted a tacit agreement and legitimate expectation that the vehicle would be sold to him at a nominal price, relying on maintenance and fuelling records. The court did not find this expectation crystallised into an enforceable right, and ordered return of the vehicle within 14 days, while compensating the Claimant for repairs and servicing from his own funds.

p. 3
05

Compensation for unfair dismissal

Holding

Six months' salary awarded as compensation

Reasoning

The Claimant sought 12 months' compensation as he had no prior warnings or disciplinary action. The court, in its discretion, awarded six months' salary (Kshs. 562,908/-) as compensation for the unlawful constructive dismissal, together with notice pay and other terminal benefits.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer placing an employee on indefinite unpaid leave constitutes constructive dismissal where not backed by the contract or law
  • Claims for public holiday and other dues must be filed within 12 months; earlier years' dues cannot be recovered
  • Uncontroverted evidence does not displace the Claimant's burden of proof on particular heads such as leave

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the Claimant has been constructively dismissed from employment
  2. 2.One month's salary in lieu of notice – Kshs. 93,818/-
  3. 3.Leave pay for 2020 – Kshs. 93,818/-
  4. 4.Public holidays in 2020 – nil as no days in the schedule fell on a public holiday
  5. 5.Six months' salary as compensation for unlawful dismissal – Kshs. 562,908/-
  6. 6.Payment of Kshs. 393,649/- as terminal benefits calculated but unpaid
  7. 7.Payment of Kshs. 150,000/- for the repairs and servicing of KCC 470L, the property of the Respondent
  8. 8.Costs of the suit
  9. 9.Interest on the sums awarded at court rates from date of judgment until payment in full
  10. 10.The Claimant to return motor vehicle KCC 470L to the Respondent within 14 days of judgment, in good shape

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 41, 43 and 45
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41(1)

Cases cited (4)

  • Max Masoud Roshankar & Another v Sky Aero Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Emmanuel Mutisya Solomon versus Agility Logistics
    Cause No.1448 of 2011
  • Humphrey Sitati v Board of Management Lenana School
    [2020] eKLR
  • Teresa Carlo Omondi v Transparency International- Kenya
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Employment Act and Article 41(1) of the Constitution (as invoked in submissions); court name implies Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Harrison Macharia Maina v Leo Design Limited [2021] KEELRC 652 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment (Statement of Claim dated 15th February 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/652/eng@2021-09-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.