Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedApplication dated 24th May, 2021 (arising from Employment and Labour Relations Court Petition No. 39 of 2017, Kisumu)· [2021] KEELRC 623 (KLR)

Amondi and Co Advocates v County Government of Kisumu [2021] KEELRC 623 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
28 October 2021
1,158 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court converted a law firm's taxed fees of Kshs. 862,100 into a judgment, but awarded interest only from the ruling date because the firm couldn't prove it served the client.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu (Baari J) determined an application dated 24th May 2021 brought by Amondi & Co. Advocates under Section 51 of the Advocates Act, Cap 16. The applicant had acted for the Respondent in Employment and Labour Relations Court Petition No. 39 of 2017 at Kisumu. Its bill of costs was taxed on 17th February 2021 at Kshs. 862,100/- and a certificate of costs dated 21st May 2021 issued. The applicant sought adoption of the certificate as judgment and decree, with interest at 14% per annum from 18th August 2020 (the date of filing the bill) until payment in full, under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The Respondent opposed by grounds of contention that no decree existed and that interest issues only arise after judgment. Framing two issues - adoption of the certificate and entitlement to interest - the court held that Section 51(2) empowers entry of judgment on taxed costs where the certificate has not been varied or set aside and there is no retainer dispute, relying on Lubulellah & Associates and D Njogu & Company Advocates. The certificate was adopted as judgment and decree. On interest, Rule 7 permits 14% from the 30th day after service of the certificate, but no affidavit of service proved when service occurred; interest was therefore awarded only from the date of the ruling. Costs of the application were awarded to the applicant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the certificate of taxation should be adopted as judgment and decree of the court

Holding

Yes. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment on taxed costs absent a variation or setting aside of the certificate and absent a dispute as to retainer; both conditions were satisfied here and the certificate was adopted.

Reasoning

The costs of Kshs. 862,100/- were taxed on 17th February 2021 and a certificate dated 21st May 2021 issued. The amount was admitted by both parties, retainer was not denied, and the certificate had not been set aside or altered. Relying on Lubulellah & Associates and D Njogu & Company Advocates, the court held that no further action is required save entry of judgment, and adopted the certificate as judgment and decree.

p. 2
02

Whether the applicant is entitled to interest at 14% from the date of filing the bill of costs (18th August 2020)

Holding

No. Interest under Rule 7 runs from the 30th day after service of the certificate of costs; absent proof of service, interest could only be awarded from the date of the ruling.

Reasoning

Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order provides for 14% interest payable from the 30th day after the bill of costs is delivered to the Respondent. The only document before the court was the certificate of costs; there was no affidavit of service or other evidence proving when service of the certificate was effected. Without proof of service the court could not compute the commencement date and limited interest to run from the date of the ruling.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a certificate of costs has been issued and has not been set aside or varied, and there is no dispute as to retainer, the court need only enter judgment; the advocate need not file suit.
  • Interest on taxed costs under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order runs from the 30th day after service of the certificate of costs on the client, and proof of service is required.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Certificate of Costs in respect of the taxation order made on 17th February, 2021 for Kshs. 862,100/- adopted as judgment and decree of the court
  2. 2.Interest at 14% per annum to run on the judgment sum from the date of the ruling until payment in full
  3. 3.Costs of the application awarded to the applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates Act, Cap 16 Laws of KenyaSection 51 (specifically Section 51(2))
  • Advocates Remuneration OrderRule 7

Cases cited (4)

  • Lubulellah & Associates ds N.K. Brothers Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • D Njogu & Company Advocates V Kenya National Capital Corporation
    [2006] eKLR
  • R-V Ivyland Park Ltd & City Council of Nairobi
    Nairobi HCC JR 69/2012
  • Makhecha & Co. Advocates & Central Bank of Kenya
    Nairobi Milimani Misc. Application No. 296 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, Cap 16 Laws of Kenya

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Amondi and Co Advocates v County Government of Kisumu [2021] KEELRC 623 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Application dated 24th May, 2021 (arising from Employment and Labour Relations Court Petition No. 39 of 2017, Kisumu). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/623/eng@2021-10-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.