Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherCause No. 289 of 2016· [2021] KEELRC 438 (KLR)

Job Mukhebi Mutoro v Kitale Vocational Training Centre [2021] KEELRC 438 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 November 2021
442 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer owing a former employee negotiated to pay a reduced Kshs 800,000 in instalments, and the court made that deal enforceable.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu (Radido Stephen, Judge) dealt with execution proceedings in a claim by Job Mukhebi Mutoro against Kitale Vocational Training Centre. On 5 May 2021 the Claimant caused the Deputy Registrar to issue a Notice to Show Cause why execution should not issue against the Respondent, with a return date of 25 May 2021. On 24 May 2021 the Respondent filed a Motion seeking a stay of execution of the judgment and leave to liquidate the decretal sum through monthly instalments. When the two applications came up for directions on 25 May 2021 the Court encouraged an out-of-court settlement, which failed, and directed the Claimant to file a response and the parties to file and exchange submissions. Before those directions were complied with, the parties filed a consent on 3 June 2021 providing for: a stay of execution on agreed conditions; review and reduction of the judgment to Kshs 800,000/- all inclusive; liquidation in seven specified instalments between 30 June 2021 and 30 May 2023; marking the matter fully settled upon full payment, with no further claim for interest; and, in default of any one instalment, liberty for the Claimant to execute for the entire remaining balance plus interest. The Court adopted the consent as an order of the Court on 17 November 2021. The pending Motion was thereby rendered unnecessary and no costs order was made. No authorities or statutes were cited.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of a consent as an order of the Court

Holding

The Court adopted the parties' consent of 3 June 2021 as an order of the Court, giving effect to the agreed stay, reduction of the decretal sum to Kshs 800,000/- and the instalment payment schedule.

Reasoning

After directions for filing of a response and submissions, the parties instead filed a consent dated 3 June 2021 setting out the stay conditions, the reduced decretal sum, the instalment schedule, the consequence of full payment, and the consequence of default. The Court did not need to determine the pending Motion on its merits because the parties had resolved the dispute over execution by agreement; it simply adopted the consent as an order of the Court.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A consent recorded by parties in litigation may be adopted by the Court as an order of the Court, binding the parties to its terms including stay of execution, review of the decretal sum and payment by instalments.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution against the Respondent by consent, on the conditions set out in the consent
  2. 2.Judgment entered for the Claimant reviewed and reduced to Kshs 800,000/- all inclusive, by consent
  3. 3.The Kshs 800,000/- to be liquidated in instalments of Kshs 250,000/- (on or before 30 June 2021) and six further instalments (Kshs 100,000/- each through to 31 January 2023, and a final Kshs 50,000/- on or before 30 May 2023)
  4. 4.Upon full payment of Kshs 800,000/- in the agreed instalments, the matter to be marked as fully settled with no further claim in terms of interest by the Claimant
  5. 5.In default of payment of any one instalment, the Claimant at liberty to execute for the entire remaining balance plus interest
  6. 6.The consent of the parties adopted as an order of the Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court, Cause No. 289 of 2016 (inherent powers to adopt consent orders and manage execution of its decree)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Job Mukhebi Mutoro v Kitale Vocational Training Centre [2021] KEELRC 438 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Cause No. 289 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/438/eng@2021-11-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.