Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowednot_stated_in_judgment· [2021] KEELRC 396 (KLR)

Promoters, Kenya Salt Workers Union (Lawrence K Majali, Folleni Chea Boshei, Moses H Kellah, Safari Kazungu Nyanje, Kazungu Kondoduka and Dethitarss Mako Kofa) v Registrar of Trade Unions; Kenya Chemical Workers Union (Proposed Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 396 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
16 November 2021
1,188 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that an existing trade union directly affected by an appeal has a right to join the case as an interested party.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by B O M Manani, Judge of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, determines an application dated 14th November 2019 by a proposed Interested Party seeking leave to join an appeal against the Registrar of Trade Unions' decision of 20th May 2019 declining to register the Kenya Salt Workers Union as a Trade Union. The Registrar had rejected the application because the field sought to be covered was already served by an existing trade union - the proposed Interested Party - obliging rejection under section 14(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007. The Appellants opposed the joinder. The court first addressed jurisdiction, holding that its appellate jurisdiction under section 12(5)(a) of the ELRC Act must be construed purposively to cover incidental matters, supported by section 12(3) and inherent powers as explained in Wilbert Kipsang Choge. On the merits, the court applied the Supreme Court's definition of an interested party in Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemo and the criteria in Meme v Republic, finding that the Applicant's mandate over the salt extraction sector meant the appeal's outcome would directly affect it, and that its input was necessary to resolve questions such as whether it had objected to the registration. Citing Osugo Paul Makombi, the court confirmed joinder may be granted at any stage, even on appeal. The application was allowed; the Applicant was joined as an Interested Party, directed to file representations within 14 days failing which the joinder orders would stand vacated, with costs in the cause. Delivery was conducted online under Covid-19 directions, with the parties waiving compliance with Rule 28(3) of the ELRC Procedure Rules.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction to entertain joinder applications incidental to an appeal under section 12(5)(a) of the ELRC Act

Holding

The court has jurisdiction to determine applications for joinder of parties to matters properly pending before it, exercised as an inherent incident of its appellate jurisdiction over Registrar of Trade Unions decisions.

Reasoning

The court construed section 12(5)(a) of the ELRC Act purposively, so as to cover matters incidental to the proper determination of appeals from the Registrar of Trade Unions. It invoked section 12(3), which obliges the court to grant appropriate relief to meet the ends of justice, and adopted the reasoning in Wilbert Kipsang Choge that the vesting of power over employment and labour disputes carries implied, necessarily inherent powers.

p. 2
02

Whether the proposed Interested Party qualified for joinder

Holding

The proposed Interested Party, an existing trade union serving the salt extraction sector, fit the definition of an interested party because the appeal decision would directly affect it, and its presence was necessary for the just and effectual disposition of the appeal.

Reasoning

Applying the Trusted Society definition and the Meme v Republic criteria, the court found the Applicant had a stake: its existing coverage of the salt extraction sector was the very reason the Registrar rejected registration of the Appellants' union. Its input was also needed to resolve questions such as whether it objected to the registration, ensuring complete settlement of all questions in the proceedings.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An interested party is one who has a stake in the proceedings and will be affected by the decision of the court either way
  • The ELRC's appellate jurisdiction under section 12(5)(a) must be construed purposively to cover matters incidental to the proper determination of such appeals, including joinder applications
  • Joinder of an interested party may be entertained at any stage of proceedings, even on appeal, provided the applicant demonstrates how the ends of justice would be better served

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 14th November 2019 is allowed and the proposed Interested Party is joined to the action as an Interested Party
  2. 2.The Interested Party to file its representations in the appeal within 14 days of the ruling to enable the taking of directions on hearing of the appeal
  3. 3.If the representations are not filed by the 14th day as ordered, the orders issued shall stand vacated
  4. 4.Costs of the application shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Industrial Court Act 2011 (renamed Employment and Labour Relations Court Act)section 4
  • Industrial Court Act 2011 (renamed Employment and Labour Relations Court Act)section 12
  • Industrial Court Act 2011 (renamed Employment and Labour Relations Court Act)section 12(3)
  • Industrial Court Act 2011 (renamed Employment and Labour Relations Court Act)section 12(5)(a)
  • Employment Actsection 87
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules (renamed Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules)rule 4
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) RulesRule 28(3)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 14(1)(d)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 14(1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 20
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007section 23(4)

Cases cited (4)

  • Wilbert Kipsang Choge & 6 others v Communications Authority of Kenya & another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemo & 5 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Meme v Republic
    [2004] 1 EA 124
  • Osugo Paul Makombi v Britam General Insurance Co. (K) Ltd; Samwel Ondieki Momanyi (Intended Interested Party)
    [2021] eKLR
On appeal from
Registrar of Trade Unions (decision appealed from)
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 12(5)(a) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (appeals from decisions of the Registrar of Trade Unions), read with sections 12(3) and 4 of the ELRC Act and the court's inherent powers

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Promoters, Kenya Salt Workers Union (Lawrence K Majali, Folleni Chea Boshei, Moses H Kellah, Safari Kazungu Nyanje, Kazungu Kondoduka and Dethitarss Mako Kofa) v Registrar of Trade Unions; Kenya Chemical Workers Union (Proposed Interested Party) [2021] KEELRC 396 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). not_stated_in_judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/396/eng@2021-11-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.