Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (a petition; prior ruling delivered 1st November 2019)· [2021] KEELRC 336 (KLR)

Humphrey Mackori Nyagoe v Kenya Airports Authority & another [2021] KEELRC 336 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
12 November 2021
4,039 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ordered Kenya Airports Authority to pay a retiree Kshs.3.3 million more because his pension and severance ignored years he served under the Public Service Commission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioner, employed by the Public Service Commission in August 1977 and deployed to the Aerodromes Department, was seconded to and absorbed by the Kenya Airports Authority with effect from 1st July 1995, and compulsorily retired (effectively declared redundant) on 20th February 2004. He petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court claiming Kshs.10,446,605 in unaccounted terminal benefits, general damages of Kshs.300,000,000 for discrimination and violation of constitutional rights, costs and interest. The Respondents pleaded limitation under sections 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act and section 90 of the Employment Act, and misjoinder of the Attorney General, but these issues had been conclusively determined in the court's ruling of 1st November 2019, which found a continuing injury in the ongoing underpayment of pension and held the 2nd Respondent a necessary and proper party; the notice of appeal against that ruling was abandoned and no review was sought, so the court held itself bound by it. On the merits, the court found the Petitioner's service continuous from August 1977 (26 years and 7 months) and that severance should have been computed for that full period rather than the 12 years and 8 months used by the Authority. It awarded Kshs.2,276,365.60 as the severance shortfall, directed readjustment of the lump sum and monthly pension to cover the entire service period, and awarded Kshs.1,000,000 general damages for discrimination, the Petitioner having received a less favourable package than comparable departing employees. Interest was awarded from filing on the severance head and from judgment on the others, with costs to the Petitioner. The claim succeeded only in part, as the monetary awards fell far short of those sought.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection and grounds of opposition on limitation and misjoinder remained open for determination

Holding

No - both issues were conclusively determined in the ruling of 1st November 2019, which was not appealed (the notice of appeal was abandoned) and no review was sought, so the decision is final

Reasoning

The court recounted its earlier ruling which found a continuing injury under section 90 of the Employment Act and held the 2nd Respondent a necessary and proper party. The 1st Respondent filed a notice of appeal which appears abandoned and there was no review application. The court therefore held it had no power to revisit the same issues, and the Respondents having otherwise not contested the allegations of underpayment and discrimination, proceeded to determine quantum and liability on the merits.

p. 5
02

Whether the Petitioner's service was continuous from August 1977 across the Public Service Commission and the 1st Respondent

Holding

Yes - the service under the Public Service Commission was transferred to the 1st Respondent, giving continuous service of 26 years and 7 months

Reasoning

It was common ground the Petitioner was employed by the Public Service Commission in August 1977 and was seconded and then absorbed into the 1st Respondent with effect from 1st July 1995. Letters of absorption and long-service recognition, including a letter of 18th December 1977 acknowledging 20 years' service, and certificates of recognition, established continuity. Severance pay should therefore have been computed for 26 years and 7 months, not the 12 years and 8 months tabulated by the 1st Respondent.

p. 5
03

What severance pay and pension adjustments were due

Holding

Severance shortfall of Kshs.2,276,365.60 awarded; pension (lump sum and monthly) to be readjusted to cover the full 26 years and 7 months

Reasoning

The letter of termination implied redundancy and severance was paid only for years served with the 1st Respondent, ignoring the transferred Public Service Commission years. The court computed severance at Kshs.152,953 per year for 26 years and 7 months (Kshs.4,066,000.60), less the Kshs.1,789,635 already paid. The claim for pension readjustment was a factual position borne out of the pleadings and uncontested, so the court directed readjustment accordingly.

p. 6
04

Whether the Petitioner was discriminated against and entitled to damages

Holding

Yes - the 1st Respondent discriminated against the Petitioner; Kshs.1,000,000 general damages awarded

Reasoning

The Petitioner's tabular comparison showed that employees who left in 1990 and 2006 in similar circumstances received more favourable packages - a higher rate of pay per year of service, pay in lieu of notice, tax exemption and payment for the entire period served under both GOK and KAA. These facts were not contested. On that basis the court found discrimination by the 1st Respondent and awarded general damages of Kshs.1 million, substantially less than the Kshs.300,000,000 proposed by the Petitioner.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an employee's service under the Public Service Commission is transferred or seconded to a state corporation which absorbs him, the service is continuous and severance pay must be computed on the entire period of service.
  • A ruling conclusively determining limitation and misjoinder issues is final between the parties where unchallenged and not subject to review; the court has no power to revisit those issues at judgment stage.
  • Pension underpayment constitutes a continuing injury such that the cause of action remains active and limitation does not bar the claim while the underpayment continues.
  • Treating an employee who exits in similar circumstances less favourably than others in rate of pay per year, pay in lieu of notice and tax exemption constitutes discrimination meriting general damages.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award of Kshs.2,276,365.60 being underpayment of severance pay
  2. 2.That the Petitioner's monthly and lump sum pension calculation by the 1st Respondent be readjusted to cover the entire 26 years and 7 months worked
  3. 3.Award of Kshs.1,000,000.00 as general damages for discrimination
  4. 4.Costs of the suit to the Petitioner
  5. 5.Interest from date of filing on the underpayment of severance pay and from date of judgment on the other heads
Jurisdiction invoked
Petition for enforcement of rights and freedoms under Articles 10, 27, 28, 29, 40 and 43 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Articles of the African Charter

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Humphrey Mackori Nyagoe v Kenya Airports Authority & another [2021] KEELRC 336 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment (a petition; prior ruling delivered 1st November 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/336/eng@2021-11-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.