Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedPetition No E055 of 2020· [2021] KEELRC 204 (KLR)

Ben Murumbi Sihanya & another v Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission; Registrar of Political Parties & another (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELRC 204 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 December 2021
2,922 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed that public university lecturers are public officers who cannot simultaneously hold office in a political party.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Prof. Ben Murumbi Sihanya, an advocate and professor at the University of Nairobi School of Law, was appointed Chairperson of the ODM disciplinary committee and sworn in on 13th August 2020. The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission wrote to him on 18th August 2020 and 15th September 2020 stating that holding party office while a professor at a public university violated Article 77(2) of the Constitution, Section 23 of the Leadership and Integrity Act and Section 12 of the Political Parties Act, and directed him to resign from the party position within 14 days or face action by the university. The professor and ODM petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court seeking declarations that the statutory prohibitions target state officers and only flagrant political bias by public officers, that his roles are compatible, certiorari to quash the EACC letters, permanent injunctions, and costs. The EACC, the Registrar of Political Parties and the university (which did not appear) responded. The Court framed three issues: compatibility of the appointment with Article 77(2) and the two statutes, violation of rights under Articles 27, 33, 36 and 38, and remedies. Applying Article 260, the Court held that a lecturer at a public university is paid out of money provided by Parliament and is thus a public officer prohibited from holding party office. The EACC's directive was lawful, fair and violated no rights. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 1st petitioner, a professor at the University of Nairobi, is a public officer within Section 12 of the Political Parties Act and Section 23 of the Leadership and Integrity Act

Holding

He is a public officer because his remuneration and benefits are paid out of money provided by Parliament, and he therefore holds a 'public office' under Article 260.

Reasoning

Article 260 defines a public officer as any state officer or any person holding a 'public office', and defines public office as an office in the national government, a county government or public service if the officer's remuneration and benefits are payable directly from the consolidated fund or out of money provided by Parliament. The Court found it common cause that a lecturer at a public university is primarily remunerated out of money provided by Parliament. The University of Nairobi, a statutory body, is also governed by the public service values in Article 232(2)(b) applicable to all state corporations.

p. 4
02

Whether the EACC's direction to the 1st petitioner to choose between the professorship and the ODM disciplinary committee chairmanship violated Articles 27, 33, 36 and 38

Holding

The respondent's action was lawful and fair and did not violate any of the petitioner's rights or freedoms.

Reasoning

Having found the 1st petitioner a public officer prohibited from holding office in a political party, the Court reasoned that holding the office of lecturer at a public university while simultaneously holding an appointed office in a dominant political party amounts to continuous political activity that may compromise the political neutrality of the office. Although a lecturer enjoys academic freedom and may express political opinions, appointment or election to party office requires relinquishing the public position. The EACC's edict, which did not treat the conduct as a deliberate violation and offered a voluntary remedy, was therefore lawful, fair and just.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A lecturer at a public university, being primarily remunerated out of money provided by Parliament, holds a 'public office' and is therefore a 'public officer' under Article 260 of the Constitution.
  • Public officers are prohibited from holding office in a political party under Section 12 of the Political Parties Act and Section 23 of the Leadership and Integrity Act, and must relinquish their public position if appointed to party office.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 77(2)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 20, 22, 23, 27, 33, 36, 38, 80(c), 162(2), 232(2)(b), 232(3), 260
  • Political Parties Act, 2011Sections 12 and 13
  • Leadership and Integrity Act, 2012Sections 23, 52(1)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2014Section 12
  • Universities ActNot specified

Cases cited (2)

  • Katiba Institute and Another –vs- Attorney General and Another [2020] eKLR
    [2020] eKLR
  • Rogers Mugusu –vs- Onyango Oloo TNA and URP [2015] eKLR
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 22, 23 and 162(2) of the Constitution read with Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2014

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (2)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ben Murumbi Sihanya & another v Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission; Registrar of Political Parties & another (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELRC 204 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Petition No E055 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/204/eng@2021-12-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.