Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs taxation; Notice of Motion dated 12th October 2021)· [2021] KEELRC 181 (KLR)

Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co Ltd [2021] KEELRC 181 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 December 2021
735 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court converted an advocate's taxed costs certificate into a money judgment, but blocked immediate collection until an unpaid-fees credit dispute is resolved.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa (Agnes Kitiku Nzei, J) on a Notice of Motion dated 12th October 2021 by the Applicant advocate, expressed to be brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking adoption of a Certificate of Costs dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021 into a decree and judgment with interest at 14% from 2nd October 2018. The underlying Advocate/Client Bill of Costs had been taxed by the Deputy Registrar on 2nd October 2018 at ksh.126,483.90, with the Ruling indicating a credit to the Respondent in respect of ksh.1,725,000 paid as legal fees for twenty-four matters in a series. The Respondent, though served, did not oppose the application; its in-house counsel confirmed non-opposition when the application was heard on 16th November 2021. The Court applied Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, holding that the taxing officer's certificate, not having been set aside or altered and not being disputed, was final as to the amounts covered. Judgment was entered for ksh.126,483.90. However, the Court declined the applicant's prayed interest regime, awarding instead interest at Court rates from the date of the Ruling, and directed that the decree not be executed until the credit directed by the taxing officer across the series of twenty-four files is resolved between the parties. The application therefore succeeded in part.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of a certificate of costs into judgment under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Holding

The unchallenged and unaltered taxing officer's certificate was adopted as judgment of the Court

Reasoning

The Court applied Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, noting that the certificate of the taxing officer dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021 had neither been altered nor set aside, and was not shown to be disputed. The Respondent did not oppose the application. Judgment was accordingly entered for the certified sum of ksh.126,483.90.

p. 2
02

Effect of the taxing officer's direction for a credit to the Respondent across a series of twenty-four files

Holding

Execution of the decree was stayed until the credit issue is resolved between the parties

Reasoning

The Deputy Registrar's Ruling of 2nd October 2018 had indicated that of the ksh.1,725,000 paid as legal fees for twenty-four matters, credit was to be given to the Respondent. Because that credit remained unquantified and unresolved, the Court entered judgment but directed that the decree not be executed until the parties sort out the credit issue between themselves.

p. 2
03

Interest on the decretal sum

Holding

Interest was granted at Court rates from the date of the Ruling, not at 14% from the taxation date as sought

Reasoning

The applicant sought adoption of the certificate with interest at 14% per annum from 2nd October 2018. The Court did not grant that rate or start date; instead it awarded interest at Court rates running from the date of the Ruling until payment in full, thereby varying the relief prayed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, a taxing officer's certificate that has not been set aside or altered by the Court is final as to the amount of costs covered and may be adopted as a judgment where the retainer is not disputed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Applicant in the sum of ksh.126,483.90 being the costs certified by the taxing officer vide the Certificate of Costs dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021
  2. 2.Decree not to be executed against the Respondent until the issue of the credit ordered by the taxing officer in a series of twenty-four (24) files is sorted out between the parties
  3. 3.Interest on the decretal sum at Court rates calculated from the date of the Ruling until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11(3)
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co Ltd [2021] KEELRC 181 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs taxation; Notice of Motion dated 12th October 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/181/eng@2021-12-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.