Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedMisc. Application No 22 of 2018· [2021] KEELRC 166 (KLR)

Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co Ltd [2021] KEELRC 166 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
9 December 2021
741 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed an advocate can convert a taxed certificate of costs into a judgment debt, but execution can be paused over credit disputes.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a first-instance application by an advocate seeking to adopt into a decree a Certificate of Costs for ksh.126,483.90 taxed by the Deputy Registrar on 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021 in an advocate/client bill of costs dated 7th March 2018. The application, expressed to be brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, sought judgment together with interest at 14% from 2nd October 2018 and costs of the application. The Respondent, Kwale International Sugar Co. Ltd, appeared through its in-house counsel and did not oppose the application; no replying documents were filed. Justice Agnes Kitiku Nzei held that the taxing officer's certificate had neither been set aside nor altered and was not shown to be disputed, and that under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act such a certificate is final as to the amount of costs covered. Judgment was accordingly entered for ksh.126,483.90. However, the Court noted the taxing officer's direction that the Respondent be given credit in a series of twenty-four files, and suspended execution of the decree until that credit issue is sorted out between the parties. The relief sought at 14% interest from October 2018 was not granted in those terms; interest was awarded at Court rates from the date of the Ruling until payment in full. The judgment was delivered virtually at Mombasa on 9th December 2021 due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of a certificate of costs into a decree

Holding

Judgment was entered for the certified sum of ksh.126,483.90 since the certificate was unaltered and undisputed

Reasoning

The Court applied Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. The taxing officer's certificate dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021 had neither been altered nor set aside and was not shown to be disputed. The Respondent did not oppose the application. The only qualification was the taxing officer's direction that the Respondent be given credit for fees paid in a series of 24 files, which the Court accommodated by suspending execution until that credit is resolved.

p. 2
02

Interest on the certified sum

Holding

Interest awarded at Court rates from the date of the Ruling, not the 14% from October 2018 sought by the applicant

Reasoning

Although the applicant sought interest at 14% per annum from 2nd October 2018, the Court exercised its discretion to award interest at Court rates running only from the date of the Ruling until payment in full, thereby partially declining the relief sought.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, a taxing officer's certificate that has not been set aside or altered is final as to the amount of costs and the Court may enter judgment for the sum certified where the retainer is not disputed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in the sum of ksh.126,483.90 being the Applicant's costs certified by the taxing officer vide the Certificate of Costs dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021
  2. 2.The decree shall not be executed against the Respondent until the issue of the credit ordered by the taxing officer in a series of twenty four (24) files is sorted out between the Applicant and the Respondent
  3. 3.Interest on the decretal sum shall be at Court rates, calculated from the date of the Ruling until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11(3)
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co Ltd [2021] KEELRC 166 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Misc. Application No 22 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/166/eng@2021-12-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.