Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutNot stated in judgment· [2021] KEELRC 141 (KLR)

Benson Kithaka Muchungu v Metal Crowns Limited [2021] KEELRC 141 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
10 December 2021
969 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court struck out a dismissal claim filed just one month past the strict three-year deadline, confirming late employment claims cannot be salvaged.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant sued the Respondent claiming that he was employed as an Assistant Quality Controller on 14th December 2009 at a gross salary of Kshs.50,800.00 and that his employment was terminated by letter dated 9th January 2012. The Respondent filed a notice of preliminary objection on 25th September 2020 seeking to strike out the suit as statutorily time-barred, arguing that suit ought to have been filed by 8th January 2015 but was instead filed on 11th February 2015. Counsel for the Respondent relied on the Court of Appeal decision in David Ngugi Waweru v Attorney General and Another, holding that the limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act cannot be extended. The Claimant filed no response or submissions in opposition. The Court, per Maureen Onyango J, set out Section 90 of the Employment Act which requires employment claims to be commenced within three years, and held, following the Court of Appeal, that this period is peremptory and incapable of extension. The Court further applied the Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' principle and the Supreme Court's decision in Samuel Kamau Macharia on jurisdiction, concluding that a suit filed out of time leaves the Court without jurisdiction, so it must down its tools. The Court also noted that the statement of claim and verifying affidavit were undated and unsigned. The suit was struck out with costs to the Respondent. Judgment was delivered virtually at Nairobi on 10th December 2021 pursuant to COVID-19 directives.

Key legal issues

#
01

Statutory limitation under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

The suit, filed on 11th February 2015 over a dismissal dated 9th January 2012, was filed beyond the three-year limitation period, which is peremptory and incapable of extension

Reasoning

Section 90 of the Employment Act requires that civil actions arising out of the Act or a contract of service be commenced within three years. The Court of Appeal in David Ngugi Waweru held the time limit cannot be extended. The dismissal letter of 9th January 2012 meant suit should have been filed by 8th January 2015; filing on 11th February 2015 put the claim outside the statutory window.

p. 1
02

Jurisdiction where a claim is time-barred

Holding

A claim instituted outside the statutory limitation period robs the Court of jurisdiction, obliging it to decline further steps in the matter

Reasoning

Relying on Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' and Samuel Kamau Macharia, the Court held that jurisdiction flows from the Constitution and legislation only. Since Section 90 ousts jurisdiction over untimely employment claims, the Court could not make one more step and had to down its tools.

p. 2
03

Defective pleading

Holding

The statement of claim and verifying affidavit were both undated and unsigned, a further defect on the record

Reasoning

Beyond limitation, the Court noted that the statement of claim on record was neither dated nor signed, and the verifying affidavit in support was likewise undated and unsigned, compounding the fatal defects in the Claimant's case, to which no response or submissions were filed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The limitation period in Section 90 of the Employment Act cannot be extended
  • A court without jurisdiction must cease proceedings at once
  • Jurisdiction derives only from the Constitution or written law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit is struck out
  2. 2.Costs awarded to the Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 90
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22)Section 4(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21)Section 1B
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d); Article 48

Cases cited (4)

  • David Ngugi Waweru v Attorney General and Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited
    [1989] KLR
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia v KCB & 2 Others
    Civil Application No. 2 of 2011
  • Andrew Maina Githinji case
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction under the Employment Act; suit time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Benson Kithaka Muchungu v Metal Crowns Limited [2021] KEELRC 141 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/141/eng@2021-12-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.