Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs taxation reference)· [2021] KEELRC 103 (KLR)

Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co. Ltd [2021] KEELRC 103 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
9 December 2021
739 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed an advocate's taxed costs become a final judgment debt, but paused collection until a fee credit dispute is settled.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Deputy Registrar taxed the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs dated 7th March 2018 at Kshs.126,483.90 by a Ruling delivered on 2nd October 2018, in which he also directed that the Respondent be given credit for fees of about Kshs.1,725,000–1,750,000 paid in respect of twenty-four matters in a series. A Certificate of Costs for the taxed sum was issued on 3rd September 2021. The Applicant, an advocate, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 12th October 2021 under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking adoption of the certificate into a decree and judgment with interest at 14% from 2nd October 2018, plus costs of the application. The Respondent, though served directly despite having advocates on record, filed no opposition; its in-house counsel confirmed at the hearing that the application was unopposed. The Court held that under Section 51(2) the taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount certified unless set aside or altered, and no alteration, setting aside or dispute had been shown. Judgment was accordingly entered for Kshs.126,483.90. However, because the taxing officer had ordered a credit to the Respondent across twenty-four files, the Court directed that execution of the decree be withheld until that credit issue is sorted out between the parties. The claimed 14% interest from October 2018 was not granted; interest was awarded at Court rates from the date of the Ruling only. Judgment delivered at Mombasa on 9th December 2021 via Microsoft Teams owing to COVID-19 restrictions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Adoption of the Certificate of Costs into judgment

Holding

The certificate has not been set aside, altered or disputed, so judgment is entered for the certified sum of Kshs.126,483.90.

Reasoning

Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides that a taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount of costs covered unless set aside or altered by the Court. No party disputed the certificate; the Respondent's counsel confirmed non-opposition. The only outstanding matter was the taxing officer's direction that the Respondent be given credit in a series of twenty-four files, which justified staying execution rather than refusing judgment.

p. 2
02

Effect of the taxing officer's credit direction

Holding

Execution of the decree is withheld until the credit to be given to the Respondent across twenty-four files is resolved.

Reasoning

The taxing officer had indicated that the sum of Kshs.1,725,000 paid to the claimant as legal fees covered 24 matters in a series, and directed that the Respondent be given credit. Because this credit issue remained unresolved between the parties, the Court judged the certified amount but conditioned execution on its resolution to avoid double recovery.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A taxing officer's certificate of costs that has not been set aside or altered is final as to the amount of costs covered and may be adopted as judgment of the Court where the retainer is not disputed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Applicant against the Respondent in the sum of Kshs.126,483.90 as per the Certificate of Costs dated 2nd October 2018 and issued on 3rd September 2021
  2. 2.The decree shall not be executed against the Respondent until the issue of the credit ordered by the taxing officer in the series of twenty-four (24) files is sorted out between the parties
  3. 3.Interest on the decretal sum at Court rates from the date of the Ruling until payment in full

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11(3)
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 11(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Maina & Partners Advocates v Kwale International Sugar Co. Ltd [2021] KEELRC 103 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs taxation reference). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2021/103/eng@2021-12-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.